Proving the Product of Jacobians Using the Chain Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lucy Yeats
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the product of the Jacobians A = d(x,y)/d(u,v) and B = d(u,v)/d(x,y) equals the identity matrix I using the chain rule. Participants clarify the calculations of the Jacobians, particularly focusing on the simplification of partial derivatives. The correct diagonal elements are derived as 2, indicating that the variables are dependent on each other. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying the chain rule and understanding the relationships between the variables involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jacobian matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their interpretations
  • Basic matrix multiplication concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Jacobians in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the implications of the inverse function theorem
  • Explore examples of applying the chain rule in different contexts
  • Investigate the relationship between dependent and independent variables in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as anyone interested in understanding the application of the chain rule and Jacobians in mathematical proofs.

Lucy Yeats
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The pair of variables (x, y) are each functions of the pair of variables (u, v) and vice versa.
Consider the Jacobians A=d(x,y)/d(u,v) and B=d(u,v)/d(x,y). Show using the chain rule that the product AB of these two matrices equals the unit matrix I.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote out the two Jacobians and tried to multiply them but I got the following:
(dx/du)(du/dx)+(dx/dv)(dv/dx) (dx/du)(du/dy)+(dx/dv)(dv/dy)
(dy/du)(du/dx)+(dy/dv)(dv/dx) (dy/du)(du/dy)+(dy/dv)(dv/dy)

= 2 2dy/dx
2dy/dx 2

Where did I go wrong/ how do I continue this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your product of A and B is correct, but I don't quite see how you got the result after that. Can you explain "= 2 2dy/dx " ?
2dy/dx 2

Perhaps you mean that those are what you get in the diagonals? I'm not sure.
 
I see what you were getting at. You're close enough to the solution, re-work the part where you simplified the partial derivatives. Check your differentials on the off-diagonal.

Edit: I removed the part about a constant multiplying the identity. Indeed B should be the inverse mapping that takes (u,v) back to (x,y), or the other way if you wish.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I wasn't sure how to format matrices so it's a bit unclear.
For the first row, first column: (dx/du)(du/dx)+(dx/dv)(dv/dx)=1+1=2
First row, second column: (dx/du)(du/dy)+(dx/dv)(dv/dy)= (dx/dy)+(dx/dy)=2(dx/dy) as the u's and v's cancel out.
Second row, first column:(dy/du)(du/dx)+(dy/dv)(dv/dx)=(dy/dx)+(dy/dx)=2(dy/dx) as the u's and v's cancel out.
Second row, second column:(dy/du)(du/dy)+(dy/dv)(dv/dy)=1+1=2

I'm not sure where I've made a mistake...

Thanks so much for helping! :-)
 
I understand the terms on the main diagonal now, by manipulating the total derivative, but I'm still confused about the other two terms.

Any help would be great.
 
if y isn't a function of x at all, and x isn't a function of y at all, what can you say about ∂y/∂x and ∂x/∂y? think of the simplest example:

x(u,v) = u
y(u,v) = v

(so that u(x,y) = x, v(x,y) = y).
 
If y and x don't depend on each other, would the partial derivatives be zero?
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K