Proving the Reciprocal Relationship of Lim Sup and Lim Inf for Bounded Sequences

  • Thread starter Thread starter Treadstone 71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reciprocal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion establishes that for a bounded sequence \( a_n \), the relationship between the limit superior and limit inferior is given by the equation \( \limsup a_n = \frac{1}{\liminf \left( \frac{1}{a_n} \right)} \). The proof involves demonstrating that \( \limsup \{a_n\} \) can be expressed as \( \lim_{n \to \infty} \sup_{k > n} \{a_k\} \) and subsequently transforming this into the reciprocal of the limit inferior of \( \frac{1}{a_n} \). The argument hinges on the properties of limit points of the sequence and the positivity of \( a_n \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bounded sequences in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concepts of limit superior and limit inferior
  • Knowledge of limit points and their significance in sequences
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and justifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of limit superior and limit inferior in more depth
  • Explore examples of bounded sequences and their limit points
  • Learn about the implications of reciprocal relationships in sequences
  • Investigate advanced topics in real analysis, such as convergence and divergence of sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching sequence convergence, and researchers exploring properties of bounded sequences.

Treadstone 71
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Suppose a_n is a bounded sequence. Then prove that lim sup a_n = 1/lim inf (1/a_n).

This seems completely obvious to me, I don't know how to do this any simpler.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lim sup{an}
= limn->oosupk>n{ak} ... (justify this)
= limn->oo[1/infk>n{1/ak}] ... (justify this)
= 1/[limn->ooinfk>n{1/ak}] ... (justify this)
= 1/lim inf{1/an} ... (justify this)
 
Last edited:
Let S={limit points of a_n}. Since a_n is strictly positive and bounded, the limit points of 1/a_n are precisely 1/s for s in S. It follows from there, doesn't it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K