Proving the Summation of (n choose k) Using Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter JessBrown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the summation formula Sum (from k=0 to m) k . (m choose k) = m . 2^(m-1) using mathematical induction. An initial attempt involved proving the base case for m=1 and then extending it to m=n and m=n+1, but the poster expressed confusion about the process. Participants suggested considering the binomial theorem and differentiating the expansion of (1+x)^m, which leads to insights about the relationship between the left and right sides of the equation. The differentiation approach clarifies how the formula holds true, particularly when substituting x=1. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the binomial theorem in proving the summation formula.
JessBrown
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For each m (greater than or equal to) 1, show that
Sum (from k=0 to m) k . (m choose k) = m . 2^(m-1)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to solve this through induction, proving for m=1, and then showing the statement for m=n, then trying to prove that m=n+1 works too, however I'm a little stuck on this part... is this the right approach to this question?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what the expansion of (1+x)^m looks like, and what would happen if you differentiate with respect to x and put x=1.
 
Nope, still no idea... i know that's the binomial theorem... don't quite get how that helps with the m.2^(m-1) bit...
 
(1+x)^2=(2 choose 2)*x^2+(2 choose 1)*x+(2 choose 0)*1. Binomial theorem, right? Take the derivative of both sides with respect to x. On the left, you get 2*(1+x)^(2-1). Putting x=1 you get 2*2^(2-1). That's m.2^(m-1) with m=2. What do you get on the right? Are you seeing it yet?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K