Proving Theorem i.5 with Calvo Apostol

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cnaeger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apostol Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving Theorem i.5 from Apostol's text, which states that a(b-c) = ab - ac. Participants are exploring the proof using axioms and earlier theorems, specifically addressing challenges in representing a(-c) as -ac before the relevant theorem is introduced.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Chad expresses difficulty in proving Theorem i.5, particularly in representing a(-c) as -ac, which is not covered until a later theorem.
  • One participant suggests proving that ac + a(-c) = 0 to establish that a(-c) = -ac, mentioning the uniqueness of additive inverses and the cancellation law.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on which axioms and theorems are available for the proof, indicating that this information is crucial for assistance.
  • A participant outlines the axioms and theorems available to Chad, which include commutative and associative laws, distribution, identity elements, and properties of negatives.
  • Further guidance is provided on how to manipulate the expressions involving a(-c) and ac, suggesting that both are additive inverses of ac.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants are generally engaged in a collaborative exploration of the proof, with no consensus reached on the best approach to represent a(-c) as -ac. Multiple viewpoints and methods are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that certain properties and theorems are not yet established in the text, which affects the proof's progression. The discussion highlights the dependence on the definitions and axioms provided in Apostol's work.

cnaeger
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am working my way through Cal vo1 by Apostol and working the problems and was wondering if someone could assist.

The question is on pg 19 to prove theorems i.5-i.15 using axioms and theorems i.1-i.4.

Theorem i.5 states a(b-c) = ab - bc.

I started the proof but am stuck at at the point indicated below.

a(b-c) = a(b + (-c)) = ab + a(-c)

being able to represent a(-c) as -ac is not illustrated until theorem i.12.

I tried representing a(-c) as -(-a)(-c) but that did not go anywhere either due to (-a)(-c) not being illustrated until i.12 either.

Can anyone help me along with this one. This is not a homework assignment as I am a BS in EE with a minor in math. Just working my way through this book to enhance my knowledge.

Thanks,
Chad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I personally don't have Apostol, though others on this forum most likely do. Either wait for one of them to post, or please post here stating which Theorems and Axioms you are given, ie what you are already allowed to assume.
 
a(b-c) = a(b + (-c)) = ab + a(-c)
ab+a(-c) + ac = ?
 
Prove that ac + a(-c) = 0... then a(-c) = -ac.. I suppose you have to prove that additive inverses are unique but you can use the cancellation law for this. Don't stress over this part too much; most proofs aren't like this. If you did most of the set proofs you should be good - generally that is the stuff that is unfamiliar compared to field axioms.
 
In response to Gib Z the Axioms and theorems available are:

A.1 x + y = y + x, xy = yx (Comm Laws)
A.2 x + (y + z) = (x + y) + z, x(yz) = (xy)z (Assoc Laws)
A.3 x(y + z) = xy + xz (Dist Law)
A.4 x + 0 = x, 1*x = x (Existence of Identity elements)
A.5 For every real # x there is a real # y such that x + y =0 (Existence of negatives)
A.6 For every real # x not equal to 0 there is a number y such that xy=1 (Reciprocals)

Th.1 If a + b = a + c then b=c (Cancellation law for addition)
Th.2 Given a and b there is exactly one x such that a + x = b. This is denoted by b - a. In particular 0 - a is simply written -a and called the negative of a.
Th.3 b - a = b + (-a)
Th.4 -(-a) = a

Thanks,
Chad
 
So far, you have:
a(b-c) = a(b + (-c)) = ab + a(-c)

Now you need to show that a(-c) = -ac... what property does -ac have that you suspect a(-c) has? they're both additive inverses of ac, so..
ac - ac = a(c - c) by a.3
and ac + a(-c) = a(c + (-c)) = a(c - c),
so ac - ac = ac + a(-c), and by thm.1, -ac = a(-c),
now just plug this back into what you had (or you could work from that form the entire time, just leaving "ab" in).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K