Proving this meromorphic function has a primitive in punctured plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a complex function f(z) that is analytic everywhere except at a singularity at point a. The task is to prove that the function f(z) - \frac{b_{-1}}{z-a} has a primitive in a punctured neighborhood of a, where b_{-1} is the coefficient of the n=-1 term in the Laurent expansion of f(z).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the properties of Laurent series, particularly regarding uniform convergence and its implications for integrals in punctured neighborhoods. There are attempts to understand how to apply the integral operator to the series and concerns about the conditions necessary for term-by-term integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of uniform convergence and the behavior of integrals around singularities. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions under which the integral of the function along closed curves can be shown to equal zero, suggesting a potential path forward.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the constraints of the problem, including the nature of the singularity and the requirements for uniform convergence in relation to the punctured plane. There is also a focus on the choice of curves for integration and the implications of their proximity to the singularity.

Poopsilon
Messages
288
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let [itex]f(z)[/itex] be a complex function analytic everywhere except at [itex]a[/itex] where it has a singularity. Prove that the function [itex]f(z) - \frac{b_{-1}}{z-a}[/itex] has a primitive in a punctured neighborhood of [itex]a[/itex]. Where [itex]b_{-1}[/itex] is the coeffecient of the n=-1 term in the Laurent expansion of [itex]f(z)[/itex].

Homework Equations



Well I know Laurent series are compactly convergent. I also know path independence of an arbitrary line integral on a punctured neighborhood of [itex]a[/itex] would imply a primitive, so would having the integral over all closed curves equaling zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



What I'd really like to do is just expand f(z) into its Laurent series, subtract off the [itex]\frac{b_{-1}}{z-a}[/itex] term, and then push the integral operator through the infinite series and integrate term by term. But I think I would need uniform convergence for that, and not just uniform convergence on compact subsets.

I feel like if I had a deeper understanding of uniform convergence I might see why only having compact convergence would be sufficient, but I don't. Beyond that I'm stumped. Help would be much appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since f(z) is analytic everywhere except at α, doesn't that mean the Laurent series is uniformly convergent in the entire punctured complex plane? Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
According to wikipedia it is uniformly convergent on compact sets and thus on only and all sets which are closed and bounded. So I think you would have to put a little open ball around the singularity and then f(z) will be uniformly convergent outside of that ball.
 
but any closed curve in the punctured plane should be contained in the plane less a small enough open ball around a, is that right?
 
Yes you're right, so the question is, is the quantifier(existential and all) situation such that given an arbitrary closed curve in the punctured plane we are allowed to choose an open ball small enough that it cuts out the singularity while leaving the curve untouched, and then at this point we can push the integral along this closed curve through the infinite series and integrate term by term which will give us zero and therefore say something to the effect of:

The integral of this function along any closed curve in the punctured plane is zero and thus f(z) has a primitive on the entire punctured plane.

It seems right but at the same time I feel like I might be missing something. Because you can always keep choosing curves nearer and nearer to the singularity and would keep having to expand your set on which the series converges uniformly and I just can't tell which you are allowed to choose and which must be given, hope this makes sense.
 
Obviously [itex]F(z)=\int^z f(z)dz[/itex] is well defined in the entire punctured plane, and F'(z)=f(z), q.e.d. Looks OK to me :)
 
Ya that seems right, since what is given to you is the arbitrary curve and then all you're really concerned with is whether the integral along it is zero and since you can always find that compact set, you're good to go. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K