Proving Uniqueness of Solution for xe^x = 1 between 0<x<1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Firepanda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation xe^x = 1 has a unique solution in the interval (0, 1), specifically at x ≈ 0.567. This conclusion is established using the Intermediate Value Theorem, which confirms the existence of a root since f(0) = -1 and f(1) > 0. To prove uniqueness, Rolle's Theorem is applied, demonstrating that the derivative f'(x) = xe^x + e^x is always positive in the interval [0, 1], indicating that f(x) can only cross the x-axis once. Therefore, the solution is unique within the specified range.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Intermediate Value Theorem
  • Familiarity with Rolle's Theorem
  • Knowledge of derivatives and monotonic functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Intermediate Value Theorem in depth
  • Explore Rolle's Theorem and its applications
  • Learn about the behavior of exponential functions and their derivatives
  • Investigate the uniqueness of solutions for other transcendental equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators interested in the uniqueness of solutions for transcendental equations and the application of theorems in real analysis.

Firepanda
Messages
425
Reaction score
0
Show that the equation xe^x = 1 has a solution between 0<x<1.

Well for this I simply changed to x = 1/e^x

Iterated starting with x=1, and got 0.567

Is that the right way to go about this problem?

Then it asks, prove that the solution is unique, which I guess means there is no other solution for the equation but 0.567.

How would I go about this part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok perhaps wrong, another way:

There is a solution where x0 is an element of [0,1]

where f(x) = xe^x - 1

f(0) = -1 < 0 < e^1 - 1 = f(1)

By the intermediate value theroem there exists an x0 in the interval with f(x0) = 0.
Correct?

Still unsure on the second part, think it uses Rolle's theorem.
 
Think I have it:

For a,b in the interval, where a is not equal to b, then f(a) can not be equal to f(b) if x0 is unique.

Then suppose f(a) does equal f(b), apply Rolles theorem:

=> there is an x0 in the interval where f'(x0) = 0

But f'(x) = xe^x + e^x which can never be equal to zero since it is always positive for our interval [0,1] and all positive values of x, which is a contradiction.

Now is the question asking me if the result is unique in the interval or for all x?

Edit: So f'(x) is always posive for [-1,inf). Am i supposed to show the lim x-> -inf or something?
 
Last edited:
yes, what you have done is perfectly good.
 
HallsofIvy said:
yes, what you have done is perfectly good.

Is there a way to show that the solution is unique for all x? i can graph it and see it is, it's monotonic for [-1,inf), do i have to show for all (-inf,-1) that f(x) is always negative?
 
Firepanda said:
Think I have it:

For a,b in the interval, where a is not equal to b, then f(a) can not be equal to f(b) if x0 is unique.

Then suppose f(a) does equal f(b), apply Rolles theorem:

=> there is an x0 in the interval where f'(x0) = 0

But f'(x) = xe^x + e^x which can never be equal to zero since it is always positive for our interval [0,1] and all positive values of x, which is a contradiction.

Now is the question asking me if the result is unique in the interval or for all x?

Edit: So f'(x) is always posive for [-1,inf). Am i supposed to show the lim x-> -inf or something?

Since you have shown that f(0) = -1, f(1) > 0, and f'(x) > for x in [0, 1], so f(x) = 0 for only a single value. A function whose derivative is positive on an interval can't cross the x-axis more than once on that interval.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K