Proving Uniqueness of Trace Function on n X n Matrices

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the uniqueness of the trace functional on n x n matrices over a field F. It establishes that if a linear functional f on the space of n x n matrices satisfies f(AB) = f(BA) for all matrices A and B, then f must be a scalar multiple of the trace function. Furthermore, if f(I) = n, where I is the identity matrix, f is conclusively the trace function. The proof involves analyzing specific matrix products and their implications on the coefficients of the linear functional.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear functionals in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with n x n matrices and matrix multiplication
  • Knowledge of the trace function and its properties
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, including basis and dimension
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear functionals in vector spaces
  • Explore the trace function in detail, including its applications
  • Learn about matrix representations and basis in linear algebra
  • Investigate the implications of the commutative property of matrix multiplication
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of matrix functions and linear functionals.

guroten
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the trace functional on n X n matrices is unique in the following
sense. If W is the space of n X n matrices over the field F and if f is a linear functional
on W such that f(AB) = f(BA) for each A and B in W, then f is a scalar
multiple of the trace function. If, in addition, f(I) = n, then f is the trace function.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to start with this proof. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any linear functional over nxn matrices has the form W(A)=C_{ij}*A_{ij} summed over i and j, right? Now work over a basis of the nxn matrices. Define D_{ij} to be the matrix with a 1 in the position {ij} and zero everywhere else. Now I'll just give you couple of examples. Let's just use 2x2 matrices. Let A=D_{12} and B=D_{11}. Then D_{12}*D_{11}=0 so W(D_{12}*D_{11})=0. D_{11}*D_{12}=D_{12}. So W(D_{11}*D_{12})=W(D_{12})=C_{12}. Hence C_{12}=0. Now look at D_{12} and D_{21}. Can you show C_{11}=C_{22}? Do you see how this is working?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K