Proving |V(G)|-1 <= |E(G)| for Connected Graphs: Graph Theory Homework Statement

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show that for any connected graph we have the |V(G)|-1 <= |E(G)|

The Attempt at a Solution



There exists a longest path in the connected graph, call H. It has |E(H)|+1>=|V(H)|. For the other parts of the graph, in order to minimise the number of edges we have all other branches out of this longest path has number of edges equaling number of vertices (any less edges and we have an isolated vertex) hence a connected graph with minimum number of edges must have |V(G)|-1 <= |E(G)|
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered induction?

I'm trying to visually see a connected graph. Say you have 6 vertices (a,b,c,d,e,f), since it it connected, you can "construct it" by say write a on the paper, then write b and put an edge. then write c, and put an edge from either a to c or b to c, and so on.. the one thing that remains invariant is that you need *at least* one edge for each vertex that you add.

I'm sure there might be a more "applied way" like consider connected graph v = {a,b}, e = {(a,b)}, then |v|= 2 and |e| = 1, so |v|-1=|e| this shows that you cannot have |v|-1>|e| "for all connected graphs" since that would contradict your example. Now you have an upper bound. But I don't know where to go from there..