Proving Vector Cross Product Properties in ℝ3?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the properties of the vector cross product in ℝ3, specifically that for the standard basis vectors e1, e2, and e3, the relationships e1 x e2 = e3, e2 x e3 = e1, and e3 x e1 = e2 hold true. A user attempted to prove these properties using the general formula for the cross product but encountered difficulties. It was clarified that these properties specifically apply to the standard basis vectors e1 = [1,0,0], e2 = [0,1,0], and e3 = [0,0,1], rather than any arbitrary vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations in ℝ3
  • Familiarity with the cross product definition
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts
  • Ability to perform vector calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the cross product, including bilinearity and anti-commutativity
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of the cross product
  • Explore the implications of the cross product in physics and engineering
  • Practice proving vector identities using specific examples of basis vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those studying vector calculus and linear algebra, will benefit from this discussion.

Jow
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
If e1 and e2 are vectors in ℝ3 show that e1 x e2 = e3, e2 x e3 = e1 and e3 x e1 = e2. I have tried to prove this but I can't get it.

My attempt:
Step 1: [a1, a2, a3] x [b1, b2, b3] = [a2b3-a3b2, a3b1-a1b3, a1b2-a2b1]
Step 2: [b1, b2, b3] x [a2b3-b2a3, a3b1-a1b3, a1b2-a2b1] = [b2(a1b2-a2b1)-b3(a3b1-a1b3), b3(a2b3-a3b2)-b1(a1b2-a2b1), b1(a3b1-a1b3)-b2(a2b3-b2a3)] ... nothing cancels and I do not end up with [a1, a2, a3], which I should shouldn't I?
I also try this with actual numbers but it still doesn't work. Am I doing something completely wrong? I understand, geometrically, why this should happen because the cross product is orthogonal to the two vectors. Am I doing something wrong or is my textbook wrong? (I am pretty sure the former is the right answer to that question).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jow said:
If e1 and e2 are vectors in ℝ3 show that e1 x e2 = e3, e2 x e3 = e1 and e3 x e1 = e2. I have tried to prove this but I can't get it.

My attempt:
Step 1: [a1, a2, a3] x [b1, b2, b3] = [a2b3-a3b2, a3b1-a1b3, a1b2-a2b1]
Step 2: [b1, b2, b3] x [a2b3-b2a3, a3b1-a1b3, a1b2-a2b1] = [b2(a1b2-a2b1)-b3(a3b1-a1b3), b3(a2b3-a3b2)-b1(a1b2-a2b1), b1(a3b1-a1b3)-b2(a2b3-b2a3)] ... nothing cancels and I do not end up with [a1, a2, a3], which I should shouldn't I?
I also try this with actual numbers but it still doesn't work. Am I doing something completely wrong? I understand, geometrically, why this should happen because the cross product is orthogonal to the two vectors. Am I doing something wrong or is my textbook wrong? (I am pretty sure the former is the right answer to that question).

I think they mean e1=[1,0,0], e2=[0,1,0] and e3=[0,0,1]. They are special vectors. It's not true for any three vectors.
 
Oh good. I thought I was missing something really important. I must have just misread the question. Thanks.
 
In fact, one way of defining the "cross product" is to assert that e_1\times e_2= e_3, e_2\times e_3= e_1, e_3\times e_1= e_2, that the product is "bilinear" and anti-commutative.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
33K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K