Proving |x-y| < b-a: Can It Be Done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter silvermane
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the inequality |x - y| < b - a, given that a, b, x, and y are real numbers satisfying a < x < b and a < y < b. Participants are exploring the implications of these inequalities and how to manipulate them to arrive at the desired conclusion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting points based on the inequalities a < x < b and a < y < b, with some attempting to manipulate these inequalities to derive |x - y| < b - a. There are considerations of reversing inequalities when multiplying by -1, and the exploration of breaking the proof into cases based on the sign of (x - y).

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights and alternative approaches, including case-based reasoning. There is an ongoing dialogue about the validity of different steps taken in the reasoning process, but no explicit consensus has been reached regarding the most effective method to prove the inequality.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of manipulating inequalities and are questioning the assumptions made during their attempts. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in the steps involved in proving the inequality.

silvermane
Gold Member
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement:
Suppose that a, b, x, and y are real numbers satisfying
a < x < b and a < y < b.
Show that |x - y| < b - a.


The Attempt at a Solution


We may start with the fact that:
i.) a < x < b
ii.) a < y < b

Subtracting a from all sides, we have that

i.) 0 = a - a < x - a < b - a
ii.) 0 = a - a < y - a < b - a

and

0 < x - a < b - a
0 < y - a < b - a

but I'm stuck here in justifying my steps. I thought about subtracting the inequalities from each other but that would just yield

0 < x - y < 0

which doesn't help my case :(
Any help and/or tips would be lovely!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) a < x < b
(2) a < y < b

well take -(2) which is
-b < -y < -a call that (2*)

now take (1)+(2*) which gives

a-b < x-y < b-a
 
Last edited:
Isn't it true that when we multiply by -1, we reverse the equality?

so -(2) would be -b > -y > -a?
 
Last edited:
Just out of curiosity, what if we wanted to prove
|x-y| < b - a

I'm thinking we break it down into two cases, one where (x-y) is positive, and one where it's negative. What do you think?
 
but i did reverse the equality then i mult. by-1
 
eibon said:
(1) a < x < b
(2) a < y < b

well take -(2) which is
-b < -y < -a call that (2*)

now take (1)+(2*) which gives

a-b < x-y < b-a

This is a correct solution. What more do you want ?;P
 
lol I don't want anymore, I was just checking. This is just for my understanding. I guess one could call it a blonde moment ;)

I just asked about |x-y| to help deepen my understanding. I seemed to have come off a little sour and I'm sorry for that! o:)

Either way, thank you greatly for your help. I really do appreciate it :blushing:
 
i
silvermane said:
lol I don't want anymore, I was just checking. This is just for my understanding. I guess one could call it a blonde moment ;)

I just asked about |x-y| to help deepen miy understanding. I seemed to have come off a little sour and I'm sorry for that! o:)

Either way, thank you greatly for your help. I really do appreciate it :blushing:

You did not come off a little sour; it was I who came off sour. Sorry about that.

You want to do the following, right ?


Case 1:

x-y < 0

a < b By definition so

This implies

b-a > 0
x-y < b-a

Thus

a-b< x-y < b-a [ Some steps are needed to get here and i didn't want to do it twice; so read case 2 . This inequality will follow from there.]

Case 2

x-y >0
x>y

y-x <0

y-x < b-a

x-y> a-b

definition and assumption of case 2
b>x>y >a

b-y > x-y

y>a

-y < -a

b-y < b-a

b-a > x-y
( the. last of case 1 can be derive from the above 5 steps)

Thus

a-b < x-y < b-a

So case 1 and case 2 is equivalent to saying .

|x-y| < b-a



The first solution is a lot easier than the cases.

Because you have to prove an upper and lower bound of x-y when x-y < 0 and x-y >0. That is like proving 4 things instead of 1.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K