Publishing as a citizen scientist

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced by citizen scientists in publishing groundbreaking discoveries while retaining credit for their work. Participants emphasize the rarity of significant contributions from non-specialists and the importance of sound scientific principles. They recommend utilizing preprint servers and peer-reviewed journals for publication, while also advising citizen scientists to seek validation from qualified experts. The consensus is that thorough preparation and credible evaluation are crucial for gaining recognition in the scientific community.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scientific publication processes, including peer review.
  • Familiarity with preprint servers and their accessibility.
  • Knowledge of sound scientific principles and methodologies.
  • Basic comprehension of the scientific community's expectations for groundbreaking research.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the process of submitting articles to recognized journals for peer review.
  • Learn about preprint servers and how to utilize them effectively.
  • Investigate methods for collaborating with experts in relevant fields for validation.
  • Explore case studies of citizen scientists who successfully published their findings.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for aspiring citizen scientists, researchers seeking to publish independently, and individuals interested in understanding the dynamics of scientific recognition and publication.

  • #61
@bugs007, have you heard of vixra.org? It is like arxiv.org, the preprint server that academic physicists use, except that anyone can post there. If you write something, and don't want to host it on a personal website, you can place it there. Your name, and the time you uploaded the essay, will be preserved there, and meanwhile you can go about submitting to journals.

I agree with the skeptical response you are getting, and I would add that there is already a vast literature of people proposing alternative explanations of quantum mechanics; if your idea is so simple, it has probably been anticipated decades ago e.g. in a "Foundations of Physics" paper, or possibly even a philosophy paper if it doesn't involve calculation. However, if you are still determined to just get it out there, then vixra is the simple answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
mitchell porter said:
@bugs007, have you heard of vixra.org? It is like arxiv.org, the preprint server that academic physicists use, except that anyone can post there. If you write something, and don't want to host it on a personal website, you can place it there. Your name, and the time you uploaded the essay, will be preserved there, and meanwhile you can go about submitting to journals.

I agree with the skeptical response you are getting, and I would add that there is already a vast literature of people proposing alternative explanations of quantum mechanics; if your idea is so simple, it has probably been anticipated decades ago e.g. in a "Foundations of Physics" paper, or possibly even a philosophy paper if it doesn't involve calculation. However, if you are still determined to just get it out there, then vixra is the simple answer.
@bugs007 Just be aware that vixra is considered a depository for crackpottery, that's what happens when "anyone" can post there. But it would definitely be a place for your work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Klystron
  • #63
There is more to publishing a paper than just writing down the idea. You need to review current thinking, which requires references. You need to show the shortcomings of current thinking. Then you need to explain your idea, and how it explains all experimental results. Then you need to put it all into the appropriate format. It is far better to team up with somebody that knows how to do all that, and has the background to understand your idea and how to get it published.

I am doing exactly this. I retired two years ago. Last summer, I met a research scientist working in the area of water budgets in inland lakes. I had zero experience in that area, but I did have a solid background in instrumentation and design. We (he, me, and two other authors) are right now finalizing the draft of a paper to be submitted to a peer reviewed journal within the next 2 or 3 weeks. It appears that I will be the second author. And it sure beats sitting around in a rocking chair watching TV, playing golf, playing sheepshead, or other retirement time wasters.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Evo, jim mcnamara and 1 other person
  • #64
This thread has run it's course, there is really no more information to give, so thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander, Tom.G and Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
198
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K