Pulley attached to two objects with a rope

  • Thread starter Thread starter zm500
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley Rope
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks connected by a rope over a pulley, with specific masses and friction coefficients provided. Participants express confusion about the significance of the pulley’s mass and how to incorporate it into their calculations. It is clarified that the pulley can be treated as massless and frictionless, allowing focus on the forces acting on the blocks and the rope. The weight of the vertical portion of the rope also plays a crucial role in determining the forces at play, as it affects the normal force on block A. Understanding these dynamics is essential for calculating the minimum distance required for the blocks to start moving.
zm500
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the system shown in the figure , block A has mass = 2.00 , block B has mass = 0.360 , and the rope connecting them has a nonzero mass 0.240 . The rope has a total length 1.10 and the pulley has a very small radius. Let be the length of rope that hangs vertically between the pulley and block B. If there is friction between block A and the table top, with mu_Kinetic = 0.203 and mu_Static= 0.250, find the minimum value of the distance such that the blocks will start to move if they are initially at rest. Ignore any sag in the horizontal part of the rope.

http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/5571/capturejup.jpg

Homework Equations



F= ma
Torque = F*R
Work = F * ds
dx = volt + .5at^2
Vf^2 = Vo^2 + 2ax
f = mu * N

The Attempt at a Solution



The attempt at a solution
I know how to draw Free body diagram, but i got confused when the problem mentioned the mass of the pulley. What's the significance of it? Do I apply work in this? I literally no idea how to start this problem! >.<
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
zm500 said:
I know how to draw Free body diagram, but i got confused when the problem mentioned the mass of the pulley. What's the significance of it? Do I apply work in this? I literally no idea how to start this problem! >.<

I don't see the mass of the pulley being mentioned in the problem.
 
gneill said:
I don't see the mass of the pulley being mentioned in the problem.

Well, my professor told me to always draw the Free Body Diagram, but i can't seem to find the relationship \SigmaF = ma with finding the distance.
 
zm500 said:
Well, my professor told me to always draw the Free Body Diagram,
That's very good advice. :approve: Do that with this problem too! :smile:
but i can't seem to find the relationship \SigmaF = ma with finding the distance.
As gneill points out, no information was given about the pulley except that it has a negligible radius. You should assume that the pulley is mass-less and frictionless.

But the rope has mass!

The force due to gravity (the pulling force) is not only a function of mass B's weight, But also the mass of the vertical portion of the rope that happens to be hanging off the pulley.

And it actually gets a little more complicated than that too. Block A is also supporting a portion of the rope's weight (the section of rope that is horizontal). Half of the horizontal portion of the rope is supported by the pulley, and the remaining half of the horizontal part is supported by block A. So the normal force is a function of the weight of the horizontal portion of the rope (and that is in addition to the weight of block A).
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K