Pulsars and Neutron Stars debunked?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical reality of neutron stars and pulsars, which can rotate at speeds between 10 to 700 times per second. The centrifugal forces generated by such rapid rotation raise questions about their stability, yet the immense gravitational forces—approximately 100 billion times that of Earth—counteract these forces, allowing them to exist. The maximum rotation rate before disintegration is theorized to be above 1000 revolutions per second. The existence of numerous observed neutron stars and pulsars confirms their reality, dismissing any claims of them being mere scientific fabrications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron star physics
  • Familiarity with gravitational forces and centrifugal force concepts
  • Knowledge of the Newtonian formula for gravitational attraction
  • Basic astronomy and observational techniques using telescopes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and formation of neutron stars
  • Explore the concept of black holes and their comparison to neutron stars
  • Study the physics of rotational dynamics in astrophysical objects
  • Learn about observational techniques for detecting pulsars and neutron stars
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the mechanics of celestial bodies and their observational evidence.

Elbert Anstein
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Now kindly pardon my ignorance but I hope one of you can explain to me how this can be possible.

A rotating neutron star or pulsar have been observed to spin at between 10 to 700 times per second. Now before I proceed further I like to draw your memories back to the merry go round we played as children. Some of us kids would hang on tight especially the boys who wanted to show off and the other boys and kids would spin the wheel. As the wheel revolved faster and faster the kids would one by one get thrown off due to the massive centrifugal forces acting on them.

These were just small merry go rounds of perhaps 3 meters in diameter and these spun even at the very fastest of around 1/2 round per secon. These already produced massive forces to fling us off. Now a neutron star may be 20km in diameter, the mass play no part in holding it together as the faster an object spins, the mass itself is acting in an outward direction increasing the inertia and being already in a rotational spin, these stars would literally fling itself out of existence as it disintegrates.

How can such objects possibly by the laws of physics be physically possible? Are these stars real or are they the invention of some scientist who is trying to wave away the problem by coming up with insane excuses.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The surface gravity of a neutron star is huge - roughly 100 billion times the surface gravity of the Earth. So, while the centrifugal force is trying to pull the star apart, the huge gravitational forces are holding it together. These things are well understood and easy to calculate. Eventually, if the star spins fast enough, it will fly apart as you said, but this maximum rotation rate is above 1000 revolutions per second.
 
Of course the mass continues to hold it together, all that mass will continue to exert gravity, and considering the [Newtonian] formula for the attraction of gravity is an inverse square of the distance, could you imagine how powerful gravity would be if you took all that mass and compressed it to 20 miles? There exist objects with gravity so stupendously strong that nothing could ever escape it, regardless of how fast it spun. They're called black holes and they make neutron stars look downright puny.

Oh also, there are dozens of known neutron stars and pulsars. We can see them with telescopes.
 
Elbert Anstein said:
Are these stars real or are they the invention of some scientist who is trying to wave away the problem by coming up with insane excuses.

Is this question serious or just some crackpot nutjob out to push his own "theory"?

You might want to lose the 'tude, bro.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Elbert Anstein said:
Are these stars real or are they the invention of some scientist who is trying to wave away the problem by coming up with insane excuses.

They're real. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K