Pursuing a Career In Engineering

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sqrt(-1)<3PF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Career Engineering
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the considerations of pursuing a career in engineering versus physics, particularly from the perspective of a high school student contemplating their future. It explores the philosophical motivations behind choosing a career path in STEM fields and the perceived differences in focus between engineering and physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a strong interest in understanding the deeper meaning of reality and questions whether a career in engineering, which they perceive as focused on "how," can satisfy their desire for "why."
  • Another participant suggests that strong communication skills are beneficial in technical fields and that one can enjoy physics as a hobby without majoring in it.
  • A different participant believes that engineering could be a good fit and encourages the original poster to explore both engineering and physics curricula, noting that the first years are often similar.
  • One contributor shares their personal journey, indicating that they initially pursued physics and math before finding satisfaction in mechanical engineering, emphasizing the advantage of a strong math background.
  • Another participant argues that physics is more suited for those wanting to explore the "whys" of the world, while engineering may appeal to those interested in practical applications and problem-solving.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether engineering can fulfill philosophical inquiries about "why" and whether it is merely a practical application of knowledge. There is no consensus on which path is more suitable for the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of personal exploration in education and the potential overlap in foundational courses between engineering and physics. There is an acknowledgment of the subjective nature of career satisfaction in STEM fields.

sqrt(-1)<3PF
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am in my final year of high school and registered in engineering for post secondary. I highly enjoyed all the sciences offered in school and I also have a high aptitude and interest in English. Initially, I wasn't talented at math, but I worked very hard. Now in grade 12, I got my first A in math, and also aced AP physics (as well as AP English literature). What has driven me is my desire to understand the deeper meaning of reality -- I am rather philosophical.

Anyways, here's my dilemma: what career do I choose?
I never thought being well-rounded would be such a pain.

I am interested in Engineering because it is structured around physics, and, although I highly appreciate and respect all the sciences, I have deduced physics to be the most fundamental way to explain the interactions we observe. However, I am under the impression that engineering sparsely delves into the "why" of how the universe operates, and is simply a mechanical, calculating, methodical way of applying rules that are only understood to a rather limited extent. Now, I understand that becoming a physicist seems an obvious path for me, but I am not so sure. I am an active and physical individual. A career as a physicist, to me, evokes images of stagnant desk-life and countless hunched-over hours of abstract research and studying. I would rather make something and watch it do things. I would rather use my skills to directly contribute to society.

So here's my question: Do you think that I, being deeply inspired by the answer of "why," could have a satisfying career in engineering, which is, to what I've gathered, centralized around the application of "how?"

Is understanding "why" not the best way to understand "how?"

And money doesn't buy happiness, but it's sure as hell conducive to it.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A couple thoughts to consider. Having good communication and English skills will be very helpful to someone in a technical field. Secondly, just because you love physics doesn't mean you have to major in it. You can study physics as a hobby and find loads of enjoyment out of it, as many people do.
 
It sounds to me like engineering would be a perfect fit for you! But I think you should find out for yourself if an engineering curriculum will satisfy your "why" questions. I seriously doubt that you will find that it's just a "plug 'n chug" field.

The first year or two of engineering and physics majors are very similar, so you don't have to decide right away. I'd advise you to take that path and see which appeals to you.

Personally I think you get out of education what you put into it, and you can go as deep as you want into engineering -- there is no "don't go past this line" limit.
 
What you say about yourself could have well described me in high school. I was told that I should study engineering, but I started college at a small school that did not offer an engineering degree. I spent a year as a physics major, and a couple of years as a math major. After changing schools, I got into Mechanical Engineering and I really loved it. By that time, I was somewhat ahead in math and physics, although I was a bit behind in some engineering classes. The extra math particularly was a huge advantage all the way through, and I never regretted it for a moment.
 
If you want to delve into the whys of the world, do physics. (Though more likely you'll wind up focusing a large amount of time on a select few "why's" pretty closely related to each other)

If you want to take things at face value and use them practically to solve problems and create things (and if you don't mind essentially being a business tool, as opposed to like an inventor or something) then perhaps engineering is for you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K