Pursuing a Physics PhD in the UK: Requirements & Admissions Info

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the requirements and admissions process for pursuing a PhD in physics in the UK, particularly comparing it to the US system. Participants explore the duration of PhD programs, the challenges of gaining admission to prestigious institutions like Oxford and Cambridge, and the implications of the research-oriented nature of UK PhDs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that a PhD in the UK can be completed in a shorter time frame, typically around 3 to 4 years, depending on the student's progress and contributions to research.
  • There is a suggestion that the admissions process for Oxford and Cambridge is competitive and may depend on previous qualifications and extracurricular activities, rather than solely on academic grades.
  • One participant notes that UK PhD students are generally registered for 3 years but often take longer to complete their research and writing.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the shorter duration of UK PhDs is due to their research-focused nature, contrasting with the US system where students often take additional coursework before starting research.
  • A question is raised about whether US students need to take additional graduate classes before entering a UK PhD program, given the differences in undergraduate education between the two countries.
  • Concerns are expressed about the potential disadvantages of a shorter PhD duration when applying for postdoctoral positions, as supervisors may question the depth of knowledge gained in that time.
  • Some participants argue that the perception of a UK PhD's value may change as the 4-year duration becomes more common globally, particularly following the Bologna Accords.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the duration and structure of UK PhDs, with no consensus on whether the shorter duration is advantageous or disadvantageous for future career prospects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity of additional coursework for US students transitioning to UK PhD programs.

Contextual Notes

There are varying assumptions about the educational backgrounds of students from the US and the UK, as well as differing opinions on the implications of the PhD duration on future employment opportunities. The discussion reflects a lack of clarity on the specific requirements for US students applying to UK PhD programs.

whalebunt08
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm interested in doing my PhD in physics in the UK... I've heard it can be shorter (4 years?) than in the US, is this true? Also, how difficult is it to get into Oxford or Cambridge for a PhD coming from the US? I'm in undergrad at Cornell U at the moment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time taken to get a PhD in the UK depends on the student. The idea of a PhD is that you contribute something to the field of research you work in, once you have done this and proven yourself worthy of a doctorate then the university can decide to give you one. Four years or even potentially less is certainly feasible for a PhD in the UK.

The first difficulty with studying for a PhD at Oxbridge is being admitted. That obviously depends on previous qualifications and how much demand there is for places in a given field.
 
UK PhD students are nominally registered for a period of 3 years, but many people have to finish writing up after their 3 years have officially finished. The time reduction (down to three years) is at least partly due to the fact that generally you're set to work on research from day one, rather than taking classes for the bulk of one or two years first (although you may still have to attend some lectures depending on your background and the supervisor's preferences).

If you are planning to pay your tuition and living expenses out of your own pocket rather than obtaining a studentship/scholarship, then you may still have a realistic shot at getting in for September 2008. If not, you may well have missed the boat this year, but it's still worth a try. My experience is that - in practice - you really need your applications in before December for most studentships.

I would also recommend that before you send your application you email potential supervisors and talk to them about how you may be able to work together. When you send in that application, I'd send a copy of it direct to your intended supervisor as well as to wherever it says to send it on the form. A flexible approach to filling in application forms is expected - for example, despite them often asking for a research proposal, it seems customary to write only the vaguest of descriptions: e.g. "Observational astronomy", "Theoretical astrophsyics", "Photonics", etc, unless the project has a specific name which they indicate.

Regards to how difficult it is to get in: your mileage may vary. A potential supervisor at Cambridge decided it was worth interviewing me straight after my less than spectacular undergrad degree on the basis of some other bits and pieces that I'd done. Oxford said I qualified for admission there too, even though my undergrad grades were such that a mid-ranking university rejected me without even an interview. For Oxford and Cambridge, who see so many academically well qualified people, I think a lot must depend on extracurricular activities and how they see your potential.

A master's degree and some work experience certainly helps, as well. This year, having been doing a masters and having had some work experience, I was offered every PhD studentship I applied for. Better undergrad grades would have certainly helped though.

You may also find www.findaphd.com useful at this stage in the year as some departments put their unfilled PhD places on there.
 
As others have hinted at, the reason the PhD time is shorter in the UK is that a PhD is primarily a research-based degree. Much of the courses we take the first one or two years as a PhD student here are done over there at the "undergraduate" level, I believe. Either that or people obtain a masters first.
 
In my field, Electronic Engineering, you study as an undergraduate to get an MEng. In my courses' case I do two years the same as a BEng Student and then similar modules in the third year and a further fourth year. From there I can go straight into research as a PhD student. It different between universities and courses.
 
Since PHD in the UK is completely research oriented with no classes would students coming from a BS from the US need a sort of middle step in between US BS to UK PHD?
ie, somewhere along the line you need to take those graduate classes right?
I may be wrong but is it just that a BS in the UK consists of more classes than that in the US so there is no need for the extra classes in the PHD work?
 
One other thing to keep in mind is that the 3-year rule (now 4-year rule) can pose a disadvantage when looking for postdocs, as your potential supervisor will be asking him or herself, "how much did (s)he learn in 3 or 4 years and how much will I have to teach him/her?"

I don't want to give you the idea that it's impossible to get a postdoc with a UK PhD; that's not true. However, there is a downside to getting a degree so quickly that you should be aware of.
 
At the end of the day A PhD is like any other university qualification - you come out of it with a piece of paper and some knowledge but that's about it. When you get a job you always have to be introduced to the job. All degrees and PhD's are about showing an ability to learn in a subject and other than basic skills are rarely about learning now to do something...at least the majority of my professors think that - one even told us he learned everything he knows now after university. It's all jumping though hoops. (Sorry if that is not a US friendly saying)
 
Vanadium 50 said:
One other thing to keep in mind is that the 3-year rule (now 4-year rule) can pose a disadvantage when looking for postdocs, as your potential supervisor will be asking him or herself, "how much did (s)he learn in 3 or 4 years and how much will I have to teach him/her?"

As far as I know 3 years is not that common anymore. Also, 4 years IS the usual length in most of the world and will -as far as I understand- be the normal length in Europe (including Russia and Ukraine) after the Bologna Accords have been fully implemented.
Hence, a 4 year PhD will hardly be a disadvantage since that it will be the norm pretty soon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
908