Pushing a block against the wall of an elevator that is accelerating

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum force required to prevent a block from free-falling in an accelerating downward elevator. Initially, when the elevator is at rest, the force needed is derived from static friction, ensuring it is greater than or equal to the gravitational force. However, when the elevator accelerates downward, the force must account for both gravity and the elevator's acceleration, leading to the formula F = (mg + ma) / u_s. The participants clarify that if the elevator's acceleration exceeds gravity, the friction force must act downward, altering the dynamics. Ultimately, the consensus is that the original reasoning for the stationary case was correct, but the definitions of acceleration need to be clear to avoid confusion.
MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Imagine you push a block against wall of an elevator that is accelerating downward. What is the minimum force you should apply to prevent block's free fall?
Relevant Equations
N's laws.
1701614072758.png

Easier case: Elevator is at rest.
We need to prevent box from free fall so friction should be bigger than "mg".(And they can be equal)
When we push with force F we know that the maximum static friction is ##u_sF##.
"mg" should be smaller than ##u_sF## or should be equal to it so the minimum value for ##F## is : ##F=\frac {mg} {u_s}##. Am I right?!

But here the elevator is accelerating downward ... I can guess that here F is equal to ##\frac {mg+ma} {u_s}## ... Is my guess correct?! Is there any good reason for it?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MatinSAR said:
Homework Statement: Imagine you push a block against wall of an elevator that is accelerating downward. What is the minimum force you should apply to prevent block's free fall?
Relevant Equations: N's laws.

Is my guess correct?
No, it is not. Consider what happens if ##a=g##.
 
Hill said:
No, it is not. Consider what happens if ##a=g##.
Good point. According to me F should be 0 in this case ...
What about 1st part (Whe elevator was at rest)? Was it correct?
 
MatinSAR said:
What about 1st part? Was it correct?
I don't see any problem there.
 
Your reasoning is substantially correct. However, let me ask you this: When you drew your diagram, you made "mg" point down (ok!) and you made curly-f=ma point up (also ok!). Since they point in opposite directions, what does that say to you about your equation? How would you correct it?
 
Hill said:
I don't see any problem there.
Thanks.
FinBurger said:
and you made curly-f=ma point up (also ok!).
Actually I can't understand what do you mean in this part. Can you explain more? Thanks.
 
@Hill @FinBurger
My friend's reasoning for the 2nd part.

The elevator is accelerating downward. "mg" and friction act on the box. If the box is supposed to be stationary with respect to the elevator, its acceleration must be negative of the elevator so F is equal to :
(mg-ma)/u_s
 
MatinSAR said:
@Hill @FinBurger
My friend's reasoning for the 2nd part.

The elevator is accelerating downward. "mg" and friction act on the box. If the box is supposed to be stationary with respect to the elevator, its acceleration must be negative of the elevator so F is equal to :
(mg-ma)/u_s
What if ##a \gt g##?
 
What is the force when a=0?
 
  • #10
Frabjous said:
What is the force when a=0?
##mg/u_s##
Hill said:
What if ##a \gt g##?
I don't see any problem.
 
  • #11
MatinSAR said:
I don't see any problem.
Then your ##F## is negative. Is it OK?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Greg Bernhardt
  • #12
MatinSAR said:
##mg/u_s##
The elevator is accelerating under gravity.
The brick is acclerating under gravity.
So the frictional force needs to be …
 
  • #13
Hill said:
Then your ##F## is negative. Is it OK?
How is that possible?
I said F= ##\frac {mg-ma} {u_s}## and ##a## is negative so ##mg-ma## is always positive.
 
  • #14
Frabjous said:
The elevator is accelerating under gravity.
The brick is acclerating under gravity.
So the frictional force needs to be …
Bigger than gravitational force?
So the net force acts upward...
 
  • #15
MatinSAR said:
Bigger than gravitational force?
So the net force acts upward...
You are guessing.
Try this.
Write down the position of the brick as a function of time.
Write down the position of the wall of the elevator where the brick touches as a function of time.
Compare.
 
  • #16
MatinSAR said:
How is that possible?
I said F= ##\frac {mg-ma} {u_s}## and ##a## is negative so ##mg-ma## is always positive.
If ##g## is positive and ##a \gt g## then ##a## is positive.
 
  • #17
Hill said:
If ##g## is positive and ##a \gt g## then ##a## is positive.
In this case the elevator's speed should decrease. Is it true?
Frabjous said:
You are guessing.
Try this.
Write down the position of the brick as a function of time.
Write down the position of the wall of the elevator where the brick touches as a function of time.
Compare.
They are similar to each other.
 
  • #18
MatinSAR said:
They are similar to each other.
You want to calculate a quantitative value. “Similar” is not useful.
 
  • #19
MatinSAR said:
In this case the elevator's speed should decrease. Is it true?
No. I consider ##a## having the same direction as ##g##. As the elevator accelerates downwards, ##a## is positive. When ##a=g##, the elevator free falls - both ##a## and ##g## are positive. When ##a \gt g##, the elevator accelerates downwards more than the free fall acceleration ##g##.
 
  • #20
Frabjous said:
You want to calculate a quantitative value. “Similar” is not useful.
2023_12_03 7_32 PM Office Lens.jpg
 
  • #21
Hill said:
No. I consider ##a## having the same direction as ##g##. As the elevator accelerates downwards, ##a## is positive. When ##a=g##, the elevator free falls - both ##a## and ##g## are positive. When ##a \gt g##, the elevator accelerates downwards more than the free fall acceleration ##g##.
According to above picture... My friend was wrong and elevator's acceleration is same as block's acceleration...
 
  • #22
MatinSAR said:
You did not go correctly from your second to the third line, but you got the idea. The accelerations need to be identical. Plug in the accelerations from the problem.
 
  • #23
MatinSAR said:
According to above picture... My friend was wrong and elevator's acceleration is same as block's acceleration...
Yes!
 
  • #24
Frabjous said:
You did not go correctly from your second to the third line, but you got the idea. The accelerations need to be identical. Plug in the accelerations from the problem.
Yes I see. The acceleration is "a".
Frabjous said:
Yes!
But then if I use N's 2nd law I get :
f - mg = ma
uF - mg = ma

F = (mg + ma) / u
And this is wrong.
 
  • #25
MatinSAR said:
Yes I see. The acceleration is "a".

But then if I use N's 2nd law I get :
f - mg = ma
uF - mg = ma

F = (mg + ma) / u
And this is wrong.
You are mixing up the variables because the names are too generic. Try using subscripts (variablebr and variableel).
 
  • #26
Frabjous said:
You are mixing up the variables because the names are too generic. Try using subscripts (variablebr and variableel).
I have only m witch is mass of the object. And a which is acceleration of the box. F is the force that pushes the box. What variables am I mixing up?
 
  • #27
Define fexternal= Melevatoraexternal.

What is the acceleration of the elevator, ael?

Let Ffriction=μFapplied to brick.

What is the acceleration of the brick, abr, as a function of Ffriction?

How are ael and abr related?
 
Last edited:
  • #28
Frabjous said:
What is the acceleration of the elevator, ael?
##a_{el} =a_{external} ##

Frabjous said:
Let Ffriction=μFapplied to brick.

What is the acceleration of the brick, abr, as a function of Ffriction?
I cannot understand what do you mean by this.

Frabjous said:
How are ael and abr related?
They were equal.
 
  • #29
MatinSAR said:
I cannot understand what do you mean by this.
Let acceleration downward be negative, and acceleration upward be positive.

mabr = Ffriction-mg
abr=Ffriction/m - g

I over-complicated things slightly. Just assume that the elevator has an acceleration, -ael (ael is positive).
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Frabjous said:
mabr = Ffriction-mg
But there is no difference between this equation and my answer!
Why do I need that ##- a_{el} ##?

I think I am completely lost.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
691
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
369
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
644
Replies
4
Views
1K