Pushing a block against the wall of an elevator that is accelerating

  • #1
MatinSAR
597
182
Homework Statement
Imagine you push a block against wall of an elevator that is accelerating downward. What is the minimum force you should apply to prevent block's free fall?
Relevant Equations
N's laws.
1701614072758.png

Easier case: Elevator is at rest.
We need to prevent box from free fall so friction should be bigger than "mg".(And they can be equal)
When we push with force F we know that the maximum static friction is ##u_sF##.
"mg" should be smaller than ##u_sF## or should be equal to it so the minimum value for ##F## is : ##F=\frac {mg} {u_s}##. Am I right?!

But here the elevator is accelerating downward ... I can guess that here F is equal to ##\frac {mg+ma} {u_s}## ... Is my guess correct?! Is there any good reason for it?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
MatinSAR said:
Homework Statement: Imagine you push a block against wall of an elevator that is accelerating downward. What is the minimum force you should apply to prevent block's free fall?
Relevant Equations: N's laws.

Is my guess correct?
No, it is not. Consider what happens if ##a=g##.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #3
Hill said:
No, it is not. Consider what happens if ##a=g##.
Good point. According to me F should be 0 in this case ...
What about 1st part (Whe elevator was at rest)? Was it correct?
 
  • #4
MatinSAR said:
What about 1st part? Was it correct?
I don't see any problem there.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #5
Your reasoning is substantially correct. However, let me ask you this: When you drew your diagram, you made "mg" point down (ok!) and you made curly-f=ma point up (also ok!). Since they point in opposite directions, what does that say to you about your equation? How would you correct it?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #6
Hill said:
I don't see any problem there.
Thanks.
FinBurger said:
and you made curly-f=ma point up (also ok!).
Actually I can't understand what do you mean in this part. Can you explain more? Thanks.
 
  • #7
@Hill @FinBurger
My friend's reasoning for the 2nd part.

The elevator is accelerating downward. "mg" and friction act on the box. If the box is supposed to be stationary with respect to the elevator, its acceleration must be negative of the elevator so F is equal to :
(mg-ma)/u_s
 
  • #8
MatinSAR said:
@Hill @FinBurger
My friend's reasoning for the 2nd part.

The elevator is accelerating downward. "mg" and friction act on the box. If the box is supposed to be stationary with respect to the elevator, its acceleration must be negative of the elevator so F is equal to :
(mg-ma)/u_s
What if ##a \gt g##?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #9
What is the force when a=0?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #10
Frabjous said:
What is the force when a=0?
##mg/u_s##
Hill said:
What if ##a \gt g##?
I don't see any problem.
 
  • #11
MatinSAR said:
I don't see any problem.
Then your ##F## is negative. Is it OK?
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Greg Bernhardt
  • #12
MatinSAR said:
##mg/u_s##
The elevator is accelerating under gravity.
The brick is acclerating under gravity.
So the frictional force needs to be …
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #13
Hill said:
Then your ##F## is negative. Is it OK?
How is that possible?
I said F= ##\frac {mg-ma} {u_s}## and ##a## is negative so ##mg-ma## is always positive.
 
  • #14
Frabjous said:
The elevator is accelerating under gravity.
The brick is acclerating under gravity.
So the frictional force needs to be …
Bigger than gravitational force?
So the net force acts upward...
 
  • #15
MatinSAR said:
Bigger than gravitational force?
So the net force acts upward...
You are guessing.
Try this.
Write down the position of the brick as a function of time.
Write down the position of the wall of the elevator where the brick touches as a function of time.
Compare.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #16
MatinSAR said:
How is that possible?
I said F= ##\frac {mg-ma} {u_s}## and ##a## is negative so ##mg-ma## is always positive.
If ##g## is positive and ##a \gt g## then ##a## is positive.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #17
Hill said:
If ##g## is positive and ##a \gt g## then ##a## is positive.
In this case the elevator's speed should decrease. Is it true?
Frabjous said:
You are guessing.
Try this.
Write down the position of the brick as a function of time.
Write down the position of the wall of the elevator where the brick touches as a function of time.
Compare.
They are similar to each other.
 
  • #18
MatinSAR said:
They are similar to each other.
You want to calculate a quantitative value. “Similar” is not useful.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #19
MatinSAR said:
In this case the elevator's speed should decrease. Is it true?
No. I consider ##a## having the same direction as ##g##. As the elevator accelerates downwards, ##a## is positive. When ##a=g##, the elevator free falls - both ##a## and ##g## are positive. When ##a \gt g##, the elevator accelerates downwards more than the free fall acceleration ##g##.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #20
Frabjous said:
You want to calculate a quantitative value. “Similar” is not useful.
2023_12_03 7_32 PM Office Lens.jpg
 
  • #21
Hill said:
No. I consider ##a## having the same direction as ##g##. As the elevator accelerates downwards, ##a## is positive. When ##a=g##, the elevator free falls - both ##a## and ##g## are positive. When ##a \gt g##, the elevator accelerates downwards more than the free fall acceleration ##g##.
According to above picture... My friend was wrong and elevator's acceleration is same as block's acceleration...
 
  • #22
MatinSAR said:
You did not go correctly from your second to the third line, but you got the idea. The accelerations need to be identical. Plug in the accelerations from the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #23
MatinSAR said:
According to above picture... My friend was wrong and elevator's acceleration is same as block's acceleration...
Yes!
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #24
Frabjous said:
You did not go correctly from your second to the third line, but you got the idea. The accelerations need to be identical. Plug in the accelerations from the problem.
Yes I see. The acceleration is "a".
Frabjous said:
Yes!
But then if I use N's 2nd law I get :
f - mg = ma
uF - mg = ma

F = (mg + ma) / u
And this is wrong.
 
  • #25
MatinSAR said:
Yes I see. The acceleration is "a".

But then if I use N's 2nd law I get :
f - mg = ma
uF - mg = ma

F = (mg + ma) / u
And this is wrong.
You are mixing up the variables because the names are too generic. Try using subscripts (variablebr and variableel).
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #26
Frabjous said:
You are mixing up the variables because the names are too generic. Try using subscripts (variablebr and variableel).
I have only m witch is mass of the object. And a which is acceleration of the box. F is the force that pushes the box. What variables am I mixing up?
 
  • #27
Define fexternal= Melevatoraexternal.

What is the acceleration of the elevator, ael?

Let Ffriction=μFapplied to brick.

What is the acceleration of the brick, abr, as a function of Ffriction?

How are ael and abr related?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #28
Frabjous said:
What is the acceleration of the elevator, ael?
##a_{el} =a_{external} ##

Frabjous said:
Let Ffriction=μFapplied to brick.

What is the acceleration of the brick, abr, as a function of Ffriction?
I cannot understand what do you mean by this.

Frabjous said:
How are ael and abr related?
They were equal.
 
  • #29
MatinSAR said:
I cannot understand what do you mean by this.
Let acceleration downward be negative, and acceleration upward be positive.

mabr = Ffriction-mg
abr=Ffriction/m - g

I over-complicated things slightly. Just assume that the elevator has an acceleration, -ael (ael is positive).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #30
Frabjous said:
mabr = Ffriction-mg
But there is no difference between this equation and my answer!
Why do I need that ##- a_{el} ##?

I think I am completely lost.
 
Last edited:
  • #31
MatinSAR said:
But there is no difference between this equation and my answer!
Why do I need that ##- a_{el} ##?

I think I am lost completely...
Your original answer was correct. I apologize.

You are doing the problem in the frame of the brick, so you had a pseudo force f. You were essentially solving from your post #20, ##\ddot x_2=0##.

I misinterpreted what you did.

My derivation was in a frame external to the elevator. I was essentially solving from your post #20, ##\ddot x_1=\ddot x_3##.

They are different ways of solving the same problem, so they come up with the same answer.

Once again my apologies.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #32
Frabjous said:
Your original answer was correct. I apologize.

You are doing the problem in the frame of the brick, so you had a pseudo force f. You were essentially solving from your post #20, ##\ddot x_2=0##.

I misinterpreted what you did.

My derivation was in a frame external to the elevator. I was essentially solving from your post #20, ##\ddot x_1=\ddot x_3##.

They are different ways of solving the same problem, so they come up with the same answer.

Once again my apologies.
Thank you for your time @Frabjous . So you are agree with my answer in post one. Yes?
##F= \dfrac {mg+ma_{el} } {u_s} ##
 
  • Like
Likes Frabjous
  • #33
MatinSAR said:
Thank you for your time @Frabjous . So you are agree with my answer in post one. Yes?
##F= \dfrac {mg+ma} {u_s} ##
I would more clearly define "a" so that it is clear that it is a negative number for a downward accelerating elevator. Other than that , yes.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #34
Frabjous said:
I would more clearly define "a" so that it is clear that it is a negative number for a downward accelerating elevator. Other than that , yes.
I completely agree. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes Frabjous
  • #35
MatinSAR said:
Good point. According to me F should be 0 in this case ...
Notice that if the elevator is in free fall, F should be zero. Your comment is a little ambiguous.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
Back
Top