Q concerning Schrödinger’s equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JDługosz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the interpretation and application of the Time-independent Schrödinger equation, particularly in relation to local gauge invariance and the roles of the potential energy function V(x) and the gauge potential A(x). Participants explore the implications of these concepts in quantum mechanics and their connection to electromagnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the A function is a gauge potential necessary for local phase-invariance, contrasting it with the physical potential represented by V(x) in the Hamiltonian.
  • Questions arise regarding how A can be identified with an electric field if it is not considered a physical potential like V(x).
  • One participant notes that the vector potential A appears in the Hamiltonian, particularly in quantum electrodynamics (QED), but emphasizes that it serves as a shorthand for Maxwell's equations rather than representing physical reality.
  • Another participant references specific pages from the book that discuss the relationship between electromagnetic force fields and the function A(x), suggesting that A is contextually linked to the particle's environment.
  • There is uncertainty about the terminology used, with some participants equating the energy function discussed in the book with the Hamiltonian.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the roles of V(x) and A(x), with no consensus reached on their relationship or the implications of local gauge invariance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations in their understanding due to not having access to the referenced book, which may affect the depth of the discussion. There are also unresolved questions about the definitions and implications of the Hamiltonian in this context.

JDługosz
Messages
346
Reaction score
0
I was reading Deep Down Things: The Breathtaking Beauty of Particle Physics by Bruce A. Schumm. He explains the Time-independent Schrödinger equation as a statement of the conservation of energy. You put in the function V(x) to describe the potential energy of the system, and then you can solve for ψ(x). I follow all that.

Later, he discusses local gauge invariance, and added a term A(x) which allows you to exactly undo any arbitrary phase changes you made in ψ; then goes on to identify A with an electric field and points out that the phase doesn't matter, so introducing local gauge invariance rather than being an ad-hoc fix inspired a way to handle all the bosons in the Lie group (1 in the case of em-field).

So, the function A represents a force field.
If you put the things influencing the particle in the A function (nearby electric charges), then what is the V function used for? Wasn't that being used to represent the potential energy of being near other charged objects? What am I missing?

TIA,
—John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The A function is a gauge potential required to enforce local phase-invariance. It is not a physical potential like V(x) in the Hamiltonian.
 
Then how is it "identified with an electric field"?
 
Hmm. Let me modify my remark, because A does appear in the Hamiltonian. For instance in QED the interaction term between electrons and the EM field is [tex]j_{\mu}A^{\mu}[/tex]. However, the vector potential A is not ascribed physical reality, but allows a very good shorthand way of writing Maxwells equations.

I'm not sure if if I understand your question. Naively I'd say that V(x) is used to denote potential that is not from the EM field.

I'm handicapped by not having the book - but I wish I did because it sounds good.
 
Last edited:
Mentz114 said:
I'm not sure if if I understand your question. ...
I'm handicapped by not having the book - but I wish I did because it sounds good.

Amazon Readerlink supports the ability to search and browse this book. Search for "local gauge" Start there and it will let you back up a few pages and go forward a few pages.

On page 224 it states,
Take any electromagnetic force field ... write down a function, and call it A(x) ... let this function A(x) be the one we put into the wave equation...

On page 226 it mentions "...electromagnetic fields that happen to be around." so it is talking about the actual context of the particle.

As for your remark about the Hamiltonian, you lost me.

—John
 
Hi John, although I've made several purchase there in the past, I'm not eligible for Amazons readerlink.

I searched for 'Hamiltonian' in the book, and there were no hits ! But "He explains the Time-independent Schrödinger equation as a statement of the conservation of energy" amounts to the same thing as saying the Hamiltonian is time invariant.

Anyhow, I can't go any further. Maybe someone whose got the book will see this.

M
 
Hi John,
I've read the pages in question and it seems to me the author is explaining verbally what is shown here http://quantumrelativity.calsci.com/Physics/EandM2.html. Scroll down the article to "Hermann Weyl and Gauge Invariance".

Note that everything hinges on what happens when the global phase [tex]e^{i\chi}[/tex] is replaced with a local phase [tex]e^{i\chi(x)}[/tex].

Also, I notice that he mentions 'the energy function', which I would call the Hamiltonian.

M
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K