Hi, I would like to confirm that I have understood this correctly.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The steps to find local maxima/minima of a function f(x1, ... , xn) are:

1) We find all the stationary points.

2) We form the Hessian matrix and calculate the determinants D1, D2.... Dn for a stationary point P we want to check.

3) We have the following cases:

i) if Di > 0 for i = 1 to n then P is definately a local minimum point

ii) if Di*(-1)^i > 0 for i = 1 to n then P is definately a local maximum point

iii) if Dn = 0 this test cannot help us determine whether the point is a local minimum or maximum

iv) in ALL other cases (for example Di = 0 for i other than n or Di with sign other than what i and ii indicate) we definately have a saddle point.

Are iii and iv correct? More specifically, I would like a clarification on what exactly happens when we have one or more zero Di.

Thanks in advance for your time.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Q on Second partial derivative test for functions of n variables

Loading...

Similar Threads for Second partial derivative |
---|

I Partial derivatives in thermodynamics |

B Product rule OR Partial differentiation |

I Partial derivatives method |

B Second derivative differential equations in terms of y? |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**