Q: The instantaneous gas discharge of the system and the C-E

  • Thread starter Thread starter tracker890 Source h
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid dynamic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principles of mass conservation in a closed system, specifically addressing the expulsion of air and its impact on system mass. The participants clarify that while air is expelled, the total mass of the system remains unchanged due to the control volume concept. The relevant equation governing this phenomenon is presented as $$ \frac{d}{dt} m_{cv} = - \rho_e A_e V_e $$, emphasizing that the mass within the control volume can change over time while the overall system mass does not. The distinction between the system and control volume is crucial for understanding fluid dynamics in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of control volume analysis in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with mass conservation principles
  • Knowledge of fluid properties such as density and velocity
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly with integrals and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the fundamentals of control volume analysis in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about the Navier-Stokes equations and their applications
  • Explore the concept of mass flow rate and its calculations
  • Investigate the implications of the Reynolds Transport Theorem (R.T.T.) in fluid systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and mechanical engineering, will benefit from this discussion.

tracker890 Source h
Messages
90
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
Confusing in the conservation of mass.
Relevant Equations
Continuity Equation
1694225190395.png


Q: Why is air expelled from the system, yet the system's mass remains unchanged? Isn't mass related to volume?
 

Attachments

  • 1694213871704.png
    1694213871704.png
    34.8 KB · Views: 95
  • 1694213895256.png
    1694213895256.png
    40.9 KB · Views: 89
  • 1694215726931.png
    1694215726931.png
    47.5 KB · Views: 89
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The system includes the expelled air.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
1694218766477.png

If the system includes air output, how should the cross-section be determined?
In a closed system, isn't it the case that fluids cannot cross the system boundaries? However, the following equation is indeed correct.
1694219220944.png

Frabjous said:
The system includes the expelled air.
 
Last edited:
tracker890 Source h said:
View attachment 331684
If the system includes air output, how should the cross-section be determined?
View attachment 331685
The system is the total mass. It's not changing in time. The tank is the control volume. The portion of the systems mass inside the control volume is changing in time, so you get:

$$ \frac{d}{dt} \int_{cv} \rho ~d V \llap{-} = - \int_{cs} \rho \vec{V} \cdot d \vec{A} $$

which reduces to ( uniformily distributed properties):

$$ \frac{d}{dt} m_{cv} = - \rho_e A_e V_e $$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous
tracker890 Source h said:
Q: Why is air expelled from the system, yet the system's mass remains unchanged? Isn't mass related to volume?
Could you please explain why you are taking the time derivative of a 4-dimensional volume integral?

1694223635092.png
 
berkeman said:
Could you please explain why you are taking the time derivative of a 4-dimensional volume integral?

View attachment 331686
I was going to mention there are one too many integral signs. 😬
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
erobz said:
The system is the total mass. It's not changing in time. The tank is the control volume. The portion of the systems mass inside the control volume is changing in time, so you get:

$$ \frac{d}{dt} \int_{cv} \rho ~d V \llap{-} = - \int_{cs} \rho \vec{V} \cdot d \vec{A} $$

which reduces to ( uniformily distributed properties):

$$ \frac{d}{dt} m_{cv} = - \rho_e A_e V_e $$
So, my thoughts are as follows, is this correct?
1694224989341.png
 
berkeman said:
Could you please explain why you are taking the time derivative of a 4-dimensional volume integral?

View attachment 331686
Accidentally typed the wrong characters, it has been corrected.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
tracker890 Source h said:
So, my thoughts are as follows, is this correct?
View attachment 331687
Yeah, that's how you are to look at it. That first derivative being non-zero is not something you are going to encounter when it comes to mass as the property in R.T.T.

In essence the system is not the control volume, its "the stuff" moving through the control volume, be it mass, momentum , or energy. The "system" enters the control volume, exits the control volume, and/or accumulates within the control volume.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tracker890 Source h
  • #10
erobz said:
Yeah, that's how you are to look at it. That first derivative being non-zero is not something you are going to encounter when it comes to mass as the property in R.T.T.

In essence the system is not the control volume, its "the stuff" moving through the control volume, be it mass, momentum , or energy. The "system" enters the control volume, exits the control volume, and/or accumulates within the control volume.
Thank you for the detailed and patient explanation. ^^
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and erobz

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K