Q-value in beta minus decay does not match.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Egomeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beta Decay Match
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the Q-value in beta minus decay, specifically the decay of 90Y to 90Zr and an electron. Participants explore the discrepancies between calculated and expected Q-values, the role of electron masses, and the implications of using different units in nuclear calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the Q-value as 1.78 MeV using specific mass values but finds a discrepancy with the expected value of 2.28 MeV.
  • Another participant notes that the difference in values is approximately equal to the mass of the electron.
  • Hints are provided that isotopic mass tables include complete atom masses, not just bare nuclei.
  • A participant successfully recalculates the Q-value by excluding the mass of the emitted electron, achieving the expected result, but expresses confusion about the omission.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of SI units versus atomic mass units (amu) in nuclear calculations.
  • Discussion includes the number of electrons in Y and Zr atoms and questions whether the extra electron in Zr contributes to its stability.
  • Another participant suggests that the decay results in a neutral Zr atom rather than an ionized one, prompting further inquiry into the balance of charges.
  • One participant mentions recalculating with the correct approach and acknowledges that Zr may acquire an electron from its surroundings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate units for calculations and the treatment of electron masses in determining the Q-value. There is no consensus on the implications of these calculations for the stability of the resulting Zr atom.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of using complete atomic masses versus bare nuclei in calculations, indicating potential limitations in the assumptions made during the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and educators in nuclear physics, particularly those exploring beta decay and the implications of mass calculations in nuclear reactions.

Egomeh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm wondering if someone could help me out finding the Q-value fom a beta minus decay.

It's a
90Y → 90Zr + e

All sources I have says that the energy released is 2,28 MeV, but when i calculate i get 1,78 MeV

So far, I've looked up the mass of the 90Y and the Zr90 and the electron and done following:

Q=(m(90Y)-m(90Zr)-m(e))*c^2

According to my databook

m(90y) = 89,9071519u = 1,49294*10^-25 kg
m(90Zr) = 89,9047044u = 1,4929*10^-25 kg
m(e) = 9,10938*10^-31 kg

Giving a mass difference at 3,15323*10^-30 kg

resulting in a Q value of Q=2,83399*10^-13 J = 1,76883 MeV

If you can tell me what I am doing wrong, I would appreciate if you would let me know.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would just point out that the difference between your answer and the expected answer is about 0.5 MeV, i.e. the mass of the electron.
 
Hint: isotopic mass tables list the masses of complete atoms (including electrons), not bare nuclei.
 
I finally got the right result!

Thanks a lot :)

I tried only calculation with masses of the mother- and the daugther nucleus, without the β particle itself, and that gave me the 2,28 MeV i was looking for.

But, I'm still confused. How can i get it right, when I am ignoring a product? if
Q = (m(product) - m(reactants) )*c^2

Am i just allowed to ignore the elektron?
Or is the electron actually a part of the daughter nucleus as n→p+e?
 
Is it really the case that people calculate their nuclear reactions nowadays in terms of Joules and Kilograms?
 
jtbell said:
Hint: isotopic mass tables list the masses of complete atoms (including electrons), not bare nuclei.

Hint #2: How many electrons does a Y atom have, and how many electrons does a Zr atom have?
 
My teacher prefer that we use SI-Units, as we will be sure that the results are in SI-Units.
Also, I don't know what county the majority of the users of this forum is, but I live in Denmark, and here we use the metric system (Don't know if that even matters here).

The Y has 39, and the Zr has 40. Is the extra electron from the Zr the β? If so, how is the Zr atom stable?
 
Egomeh said:
My teacher prefer that we use SI-Units, as we will be sure that the results are in SI-Units.
Also, I don't know what county the majority of the users of this forum is, but I live in Denmark, and here we use the metric system (Don't know if that even matters here).

The Y has 39, and the Zr has 40. Is the extra electron from the Zr the β? If so, how is the Zr atom stable?

1) What Bill_K is referring to is that nuclear reactions (in my experience, and apparently his) are computed using amu and mev directly. Going to joules and kilograms seems lunatic.

2) Do you think, when Y decays by beta, and emits a high energy electron which escapes, the result is a neutral Zr or an ionized Zr? Account for this and all will balance.
 
"Something is rotten in Denmark."
 
  • #10
Hmmm... The calculation in diferent unit is not a matter here, as my calculator is able output the result in the right units and as well able to convert from kg to amu, Joule to eV amd so on.

But I have now calculated the whole thing over again, with all taking the masses og the nucleus and removing electrons and getting the right energy, and seems to work. But Zr also seems to be taking an electron from it's surroundings, but then again, I don't see any reason why that couldn't happen.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K