Q value of 3H(p,n)3He nuclear reaction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Q-value for the nuclear reaction H-3 + p > He-3 + n is calculated to be -1.2715 MeV using the formula Q = (Mi - Mf)*c^2, where Mi and Mf represent the initial and final masses, respectively. The discrepancy with the commonly referenced value of -763.15 KeV arises from the inclusion of electron mass in atomic mass calculations. For accurate results, only nuclear masses should be used, excluding the mass of electrons, which is negligible in most cases but significant in this context. The correction for electron mass is crucial for precise Q-value determination.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear reactions and Q-value calculations
  • Familiarity with atomic and nuclear mass concepts
  • Knowledge of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Basic principles of conservation of charge in nuclear physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between atomic mass and nuclear mass
  • Learn about the significance of electron mass in nuclear reactions
  • Explore additional examples of Q-value calculations in nuclear physics
  • Investigate the role of conservation laws in nuclear reactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, researchers calculating Q-values for nuclear reactions, and educators teaching concepts related to atomic and nuclear mass differences.

Astrofiend
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Problem:

I'm trying to calculate the Q-value for the nuclear reaction H-3 + p > He-3 + n, where H-3 is Deuterium, p is a proton, He-3 is Helium 3 and n is of course a neutron. Doing the calculation, I get -1.2715 MeV for the Q, but my textbook and an online 'Q-calculator' both give -763.15 KeV - I cannot work out where I'm going wrong - can anybody help?!

My method:

The Q-value for a reaction is given by the difference in the initial and final masses of the system (times the speed of light squared), and is equal to the energy 'liberated' by the reaction. I.e. Q = (Mi - Mf)*c^2.

Now Mi = M(3H) + M(p) = 3.016049u + 1.00728u = 4.023329u

and Mf = M(3He) + M(n) = 3.016029u + 1.008665u = 4.024694u

Mi - Mf = -0.001365

Q = -0.001365 * 931.5 MeV/u = -1.2715 MeV

But all other sources that I can find listing the Q for this reaction give -0.76375 MeV.

Where am I going wrong and how do I make it better?!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a tricky one. The answer is in the definitions.

Atomic mass includes the mass of Protons, Neutrons, and Electrons!

When isotopic mass is quoted, it includes the mass of the electrons. The mass of the nuclei needs to be corrected for the mass of the electrons.

Using the values you quoted here, the reaction that you are calculating for is

p + ^{3}_{1}H + e \rightarrow ^{3}_{2}He + n + 2e.

The first thing that should occur to you is the violation of conservation of charge.
 
Last edited:
No, it's nuclear reaction, and nuclear does not include electron. U don't need to count the mass of the electron. In fact, it's too small comparing to the mass of proton or neutron, so u usually just count it out.
 
Usually, the mass of the electron may be approximated to be negligible, but in this particular scenario, the rest energy of an electron = 0.511 MeV, which is pretty much the difference between -1.272MeV and -0.763MeV, except for rounding errors.
 
Last edited:
It's true that if there's Beta radiation, u must count the mass of electron. But there's no Beta rad here, just neutron.

(1,1)p + (3,1)H > (3,2)He + (1,0)n

U just can't put e in.
 
Ah, I think I was not clear about what I meant by the reaction
<br /> p +^{3}_{1}H + e \rightarrow^{3}_{2}He + n + 2e<br />.

I meant it as what Astrofield was calculating - I'm not proposing it as the actual reaction that occurs in nature.

I agree with what you say - what I'm pointing out is that Q-value calculations are based on nuclear masses - not atomic masses. As atomic masses are the masses that are typically quoted, electron mass needs to be subtracted to obtain the nuclear mass.

In some cases, this correction is not needed. However, in this case, p refers to a bare proton, and not a ^{1}_{1}H atom, and atomic values quoted for a ^{1}_{1}H atom differ from the mass of a bare proton due to one additional electron.

Here is a reference:
"ctaps.yu.edu.jo/physics/Courses/Phys441/PDF_Files/Phys441_Chapter9.pdf"[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot Hao - forgot about those little suckers! That reference you provided even has the exact calculation as an example!

Cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K