QFT: Computing S-Operator to 1st Order in Coupling Constant lambda

  • Thread starter Thread starter WarnK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phi Qft
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around computing the S-operator to first order in the coupling constant lambda, specifically using a given Lagrangian density for a scalar field. Participants are examining the implications of applying Wick's theorem to the time-ordered product of the scalar field's fourth power.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the S-operator and question why the expression might yield zero. There is a focus on the application of Wick's theorem and the nature of disconnected diagrams in scattering theory.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of the diagrams involved and questioning the assumptions about the contributions of disconnected diagrams to scattering amplitudes. Some participants suggest that the original expression may not be sufficient for calculating scattering processes, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for external fields in the calculation to connect to scattering processes, which raises questions about the completeness of the original setup. Participants are navigating the implications of the Lagrangian and the role of different types of diagrams in the context of quantum field theory.

WarnK
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compute the S-operator to first order in the coupling constant lambda.


Homework Equations


The given Lagrangian density is
[tex]L = : \frac{1}{2} (\partial_{\mu} \phi)^2 - \frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2 + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4 :[/tex]
where phi is a scalar field.

The Attempt at a Solution



S = 1+iT
and I want to calculate iT to first order, which I guess is
[tex]<0|T\big( -i\int d^4x \frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi(x)^4 \big)|0>[/tex]
using Wick's theorem, how is this anything except zero? Or I'm I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WarnK said:

Homework Statement


Compute the S-operator to first order in the coupling constant lambda.


Homework Equations


The given Lagrangian density is
[tex]L = : \frac{1}{2} (\partial_{\mu} \phi)^2 - \frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2 + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4 :[/tex]
where phi is a scalar field.

The Attempt at a Solution



S = 1+iT
and I want to calculate iT to first order, which I guess is
[tex]<0|T\big( -i\int d^4x \frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi(x)^4 \big)|0>[/tex]
using Wick's theorem, how is this anything except zero? Or I'm I missing something?

Why do you think this should give zero?Wick's theorem tells you to sum over all the possible contractions so you can contract the first field with the second and the third with the fourth or the first with the third and the second with the fourth or the first with the fourth and the second with the third.
 
WarnK said:
how is this anything except zero?
each phi is a linear combination of creation and annihilation terms, so it's not too hard to believe that you can get some non-zero piece out of <phi^4>. To say something quantitative you want to write the time ordered product in terms of normal ordered products and contractions... which is done using wick's theorem.
 
[tex] <0|T\big( -i\int d^4x \frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi(x)^4 \big)|0>[/tex]
is only one kind of diagram; a disconnected one with no external legs. And that doesn't contribute to any scattering?
 
WarnK said:
[tex] <0|T\big( -i\int d^4x \frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi(x)^4 \big)|0>[/tex]
is only one kind of diagram; a disconnected one with no external legs. And that doesn't contribute to any scattering?

but that doesn't mean it is equal to zero. The disconnected diagrams in a scattering amplitude factor and cancel with the "denominator" of, say <T[phi_x phi_y phi_z phi_w S(inf)]>/<S(inf)>, but they aren't zero, they just don't "contribute" to the amplitude.

if you want to calculate, say, the free energy then you have to evaluate diagram w no external legs explicitly.
 
WarnK said:
[tex] <0|T\big( -i\int d^4x \frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi(x)^4 \big)|0>[/tex]
is only one kind of diagram; a disconnected one with no external legs. And that doesn't contribute to any scattering?

You are right. Is this really the calculation you have to do?

Normally, if you have to calculate the scattering of, say, two particles to two particles, you will need to evaluate not th eexpression you wrote above but rather

[tex] <0|T\big( -i ~ \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \phi(x_3) \phi(x_4) \int d^4x \frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi(x)^4 \big)|0>[/tex]

i.e. there are fields connected to the external spacetime points. Are you sure you don't have those fields as well? If not, then you get only disconnected diagrams as you said. And it makes sense that there is no scattering from your expression since there is no extrenal field to connect to!
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K