QFT for the Gifted Amateur Exercise 17.1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In exercise 17.1, the propagator is shown to be equivalent to the expression $$G^+_o(p,t_x,q,t_y)=\theta(t_x-t_y)e^{-i(E_pt_x-E_qt_y)}\delta^{(3)}(p-q)$$ by utilizing time evolution operators on the creation and annihilation operators. The derivation confirms that the Hamiltonians act on the ground state to yield the correct energy term. The discussion clarifies that the three-dimensional Dirac delta function arises from the interference of the ladder operators, which vanish for non-equal momenta, thus justifying the combination of the operators into the delta function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly propagators.
  • Familiarity with creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics and time evolution in quantum systems.
  • Basic grasp of Dirac delta functions and their properties in three dimensions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of propagators in quantum field theory.
  • Learn about the role of time evolution operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the properties and applications of Dirac delta functions in physics.
  • Investigate the commutation relations of creation and annihilation operators.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and anyone studying quantum field theory, particularly those focusing on propagators and operator algebra.

43arcsec
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
43arcsec said:
In exercise 17.1 we are asked to show that the propagator:

$$G^+_o(p,t_x,q,t_y)=\theta(t_x-t_y)<0|\hat{a}_p(t_x)\hat{a}^\dagger_q(t_y)|0>$$ is the same as

$$\theta(t_x-t_y)e^{-i(E_pt_x-E_qt_y)}\delta^{(3)}(p-q)$$

so we can take the time dependence out of the creation and annihilation operators by using the time evolution operators giving us

$$\theta(t_x-t_y)<0|e^{iHt_x}\hat{a}_pe^{-iH(t_x-t_y)}\hat{a}^\dagger_q e^{-iHt_y}|0>$$

If I have this right, then the rightmost Hamiltonian acts on the ground state |0> to produce $$e^{-iE_gt_y}$$
The middle Hamiltonian acts on the ground state with a particle of momentum q added at times tx and ty to produce $$e^{-i(E_g+E_q)t_x-i(E_g+E_q)t_y}$$
The leftmost Hamiltonian acts on the ground state, the particle of momentum q and an annihilated particle p (which turns the energy negative?) at time tx producing $$e^{-i(E_g+E_q-E_q)t_x}$$
Putting this all together we arrive at the correct energy term $$e^{-i(E_pt_x-E_qt_y)}$$

Rewriting, $$G^+_o(p,t_x,q,t_y)=\theta(t_x-t_y)e^{-i(E_pt_x-E_qt_y)}<0|\hat{a}_p\hat{a}^\dagger_q|0>$$
So I am left with the questions:

1)what justifies the creation and annihilation operators combining to give the $$\delta^{(3)}(p-q)$$
2) where does the 3 come from on the $$\delta^{(3)}$$
 
2) The (3) is just a shorthand for the 3-dimensional Dirac delta, ## δ(p_x - q_x) δ(p_y - q_y) δ(p_z - q_z) ##.

1) My knowledge here is rather shaky, but since no one has answered you, I'll give it a shot. Think of a superposition of 2 sine functions with frequencies p and q. For p≠q, they interfere constructively and destructively, so that the integral over all the reals vanishes. For p=q, they interfere constructively everywhere, giving a nonzero contribution. The time dependent ladder operators here do the same: their product vanishes for p≠q, leaving only the contribution for p=q, which is just what δ means.

So I suppose you'd have to replace the operators by the δ before you take out the time dependence, but at that point I'm lost as well.

Hope that helps.
 
You still need to do the last step, right? You need to calculate \langle 0 | a_p a^\dagger_q |0 \rangle To calculate this, you need to express it in terms of a commutator and a product \langle 0 | a^\dagger_q a_p |0 \rangle which gives zero. The commutator piece will give you the three-dimensional delta function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K