QFT: Normalization of coherent states

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the normalization of coherent states in quantum field theory, specifically examining the expression for the inner product of coherent states. The derivation shows that the normalization constant \( N \) can be expressed in terms of an integral involving the coherent state parameter \( \eta_k \). A key point raised is the need to generalize the calculation to account for two sums, leading to a potential issue with factorial terms that complicate the exponential form. The use of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula and properties of coherent states are suggested as tools to simplify the derivation. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the mathematical intricacies involved in normalizing coherent states and the importance of understanding the underlying commutation relations.
Marioweee
Messages
18
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
We can define a coherent state of scalar fields as ## \ket{\eta_k}=Ne^{A}\ket{0}## with ##A=\int \dfrac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3 \sqrt{2E_K}}\eta_k a^{\dagger}_{k} ## where the ##a_k## are the destruction operators of a real ##\phi## scalar field and ## \eta_k## functions of momentum k with sufficiently convergent behavior at infinity.
a) Compute N such that ##\braket{\eta_k | \eta_k}=1##.
Relevant Equations
##[a_p, a_{q}^{\dagger}]=(2\pi)^3 \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{q})##
##e^{X}=\sum_{i}^{\infty}\dfrac{X^i}{i!} ##
What I have done is the following:
\begin{equation}
\braket{\eta_k | \eta_k}=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\bra{0}(A^{\dagger})^nA^n\ket{0}=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\int \dfrac{d^{3n}kd^{3n}p}{(2\pi)^{3n}(2\pi)^{3n}\sqrt{(2E_k)^{n}}\sqrt{(2E_p)^{n}}}\eta^{n}_{k}\eta_{p}^{n}\bra{0}(a_{k}a^{\dagger}_{p})^{n}\ket{0}
\end{equation}
We know that ##\bra{0}a_{k}a^{\dagger}_{p}\ket{0}=\bra{0}[a_{k},a^{\dagger}_{p}]\ket{0}+\bra{0}a^{\dagger}_{p}a_{k}\ket{0}=(2\pi)^3 \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{k})\bra{0}\ket{0}=(2\pi)^3 \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{k})## since the action of the destruction operator on the void returns us a zero. But we want to calculate ## \bra{0}(a_{k}a^{\dagger}_{p})^n\ket{0}## , however, this is nothing more than ## \bra{0}(a_{k}a^{\dagger}_{p})(a_{k}a^{\dagger}_{p})(a_{k}a^{\dagger}_{p})...\ket{0}=(2\pi)^{3n} \delta^{(3n)}(\vec{p}-\vec{k})##

Therefore
\begin{equation}
\braket{\eta_k | \eta_k}=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\int \dfrac{d^{3n}kd^{3n}p}{(2\pi)^{3n}(2\pi)^{3n}\sqrt{(2E_k)^{n}}\sqrt{(2E_p)^{n}}}\eta^{n}_{k}\eta_{p}^{n}\bra{0}(a_{k}a^{\dagger}_{p})^{n}\ket{0}=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\int \dfrac{d^{3n}kd^{3n}p}{(2\pi)^{3n}(2\pi)^{3n}\sqrt{(2E_k)^{n}}\sqrt{(2E_p)^{n}}}\eta^{n}_{k}\eta_{p}^{n}(2\pi)^{3n} \delta^{(3n)}(\vec{p}-\vec{k})=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\int \dfrac{d^{3n}k}{(2\pi)^{3n}(2E_k)^{n}}\eta^{2n}_{k}=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\left( \int \dfrac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_k)}\eta^{2}_{k}\right)^n=|N|^2e^{\int \dfrac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_k)}\eta^{2}_{k}}=1 \rightarrow N=e^{-\dfrac{1}{2}\int \dfrac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_k)}\eta^{2}_{k}}
\end{equation}

Would this result be correct? If so, I have a doubt, since I have tried to make it more general since in principle we would need two sums for each exponential. I mean
\begin{equation}
\braket{\eta_k | \eta_k}=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\dfrac{1}{m!}\bra{0}(A^{\dagger})^nA^m\ket{0}=|N|^2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{n!}\dfrac{1}{m!}\int \dfrac{d^{3n}kd^{3m}p}{(2\pi)^{3n}(2\pi)^{3m}\sqrt{(2E_k)^{n}}\sqrt{(2E_p)^{m}}}\eta^{n}_{k}\eta_{p}^{m}\bra{0}a_{k}^{n}(a^{\dagger}_{p})^{m}\ket{0}
\end{equation}
It is clear that for ##\bra{0}(a_{k}^{n}a^{\dagger}_{p})^{m}\ket{0}\neq 0 ## m and n must be equal and must appear in the equation ## \delta_{m,n}##. Now, if m is equal to n, we do the steps above. However, I find a problem with the factorial of n that appears twice, which does not allow to have the expression of the exponential. What am I doing wrong?
Thank you very much for any kind of help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem reduces drastically, down to merely a few lines if you know the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff (BCH) formula $$e^{A+B} ~=~ e^A e^B e^{-[A,B]/2} ~,$$ which is true when ##[A,B]## commutes with both ##A## and ##B##.

You'll also need to use (or prove) the result that a (Glauber) coherent state is an eigenstate of the annihiliation operator, then use a generalized form of the commutation relations that says $$[a, f(a^\dagger)] ~=~ \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial a^\dagger} \, f(a^\dagger) ~.$$ To complete this exercise properly, you should probably prove the latter, (e.g., by induction and a couple of other tricks).

Some of these utility formulas are probably mentioned in your textbook(s), no?
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, vanhees71, topsquark and 1 other person
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...