QFT: Srednicki's Book: What Does a(x) Represent?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hymne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of the quantum field a(x) as introduced in Srednicki's book on Quantum Field Theory (QFT). The field represents creation and annihilation operators for particles, with the state |0⟩ indicating "no particles" and states like a†(x1)|0⟩ representing one particle at position x1. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding operator algebra to grasp the Hamiltonian's formulation in terms of these operators. For deeper insights, it is recommended to explore Sidney Coleman's QFT lectures and additional resources provided.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with creation and annihilation operators
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum systems
  • Basic operator algebra in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Sidney Coleman's QFT lecture series for foundational concepts
  • Explore the derivation of quantization of scalar fields in Srednicki's book
  • Research operator algebra techniques in quantum mechanics
  • Review additional resources on QFT from the University of Toronto's physics department
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hello! I have a question conserning Srednicki´s book on QFT. On page 27 he introduces a quantum field a(x) and its h.c. .
What does this field represent? What should I think of when he uses this field?

He writes the hamiltionian on the regular form but multiplicates with a(x) and its h.c. and then integrates over all of space...

It seems to be creation and annihilation operators for particles, but i don't really see the reason for this method.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
He does give you a way to interpret the operators:

"Thus we can interpret the state |0⟩ as a state of “no particles”, the state
a† (x1 ) |0⟩ as a state with one particle at position x1 , the state a† (x1 )a† (x2 )|0⟩
as a state with one particle at position x1 and another at position x2 , and
so on."

But it does seem to me that Srednicki is rather weak here on motivation. I would suggest watching the first few of Sidney Coleman's QFT lectures. There are also some good notes here:

http://www.physics.utoronto.ca/~luke/PHY2403/References.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the point of this little demo is to make you work through a bit of operator algebra to see how a and a-dagger work algebraically, and how you can write a Hamiltonian in terms of creation and annihilation operators. In chapter 3 on quantization of scalar fields you get a derivation where these operators emerge naturally as important things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K