QHO Solutions: What is Imaginary Part?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Imaginary
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the imaginary part of wave functions in the context of the Schrödinger Equation for the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator, specifically referencing Hermite Polynomials. While the Wikipedia article primarily addresses the real part of these solutions, the inquiry seeks resources on the imaginary components. The theorem cited from Sakurai and Napolitano's "Modern Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition" asserts that for time-reversal-independent Hamiltonians, non-degenerate energy eigenfunctions can be chosen to be real, suggesting that the imaginary part is conventionally not emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger Equation
  • Familiarity with Quantum Harmonic Oscillator concepts
  • Knowledge of Hermite Polynomials
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding Hamiltonians
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of imaginary components in quantum wave functions
  • Study the implications of the theorem from Sakurai and Napolitano on energy eigenfunctions
  • Explore advanced quantum mechanics texts for deeper insights into Hermite Polynomials
  • Investigate time-reversal symmetry in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists studying wave functions, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
34
The solutions, in the position basis, of the Schrödinger Equation for the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator are a family of functions based on the Hermite Polynomials. The Wikipedia link for this subject is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator .

But this Wikipedia article and most of what I have read on this topic only descirbes the REAL part of this family of solutions. What is, or where can I read about, the IMAGINARY part of these wave functions?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a theorem (see Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern QM, Second Edition) that for a time-reversal-independent Hamiltonian (such as the one under consideration here), non-denegerate energy eigenfunctions of a spinless particle can always be chosen to be real. Then choosing them to be purely real, rather than having a global phase factor, is merely an extremely sensible convention.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K