[qm]find the angular opertor given total angular momentum wavefunction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving total angular momentum, specifically focusing on a state with total angular momentum quantum number l=1. The original poster presents a wavefunction and seeks to determine the operator associated with angular momentum, particularly L_y.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the operator notation and whether the task involves finding an expectation value or operating directly on the wavefunction. There are attempts to clarify the notation and the correct interpretation of the problem statement.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with some participants suggesting that the original poster may have misinterpreted the notation. Guidance has been offered regarding the proper way to express expectation values and the need to operate on the wavefunction with the angular momentum operator.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the notation used in the problem, particularly with the operator being placed inside a ket. Participants also express uncertainty about the limits of integration and the orthogonality of the basis states involved.

JayKo
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



consider a system with total angular momentum, l=1 in the state

|[tex]\psi[/tex]>=[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1>-\frac{1}{2}|0>+\frac{1}{2}|-1>[/tex]
find |[tex]^{^}L_{\psi}>[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]^{^}L_{z}|\psi>=\hbar m|\psi>[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



the basis in the wavefunction given are|1> , |0>, |-1> and there are orthogonal. but I'm not sure what the question is really asking. anyone care to shed some light on this question.thanks

it shoud be L subsript y not psi. just couldn't read the handwriting
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot interpret what | Ly> might mean. The symbol for an operator is not normally placed inside a ket. Since there is handwriting involved, is it possible that you are asked to find the expectation value < Ly>? That makes more sense.
 
i've done no work in like four months for summer but am going back soon so can somebody tell me if I've done this correctly please.

say we wanted to find [itex]<L_y=1>[/itex], we would do:

[itex]<L_y=1>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^{\star} \cdot 1 \cdot \psi dx=\int_{-1}^{1} \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4} dx[/itex] where i have used the orthogonality of the kets.

and so [itex]<L_y=1>=\int_{-1}^{1} dx = \frac{x^2}{2} |_{x=-1}^{x=1}=0[/itex]

well that's definitely wrong. I am pretty sure i can't just change the limits from infinity to 1 etc in this case. jeez i need to get some work done in the next couple of weeks to get back up to speed lol.
 
I do not understand what you mean by

[tex]\left\langle L_{y} } = 1 \right\rangle[/tex]

An expectation value is usually written as

[tex]\left\langle \psi | L_{y} | \psi \right\rangle[/tex]

an abbreviated form of which is

[tex]\left\langle L_{y} \right\rangle[/tex]

You have to "sandwich" Ly between the bra and the ket of the wavefunction |ψ> that you have then distribute it among all nine possibilities of bra-kets.
 
bleh...it's going to be a long road back.

ok try this:

[itex]<\psi^{\star}|L_y|\psi>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^{\star} L_y \psi dx[/itex]

when we dot product [itex]\psi^{\star}[/itex] and [itex]\psi[/itex] we get 1 though due to ket orthogonality.
what value do I use for [itex]L_y[/itex]?
do the limits change due to the allowed values for [itex]L_y[/itex]?

thanks for your help.
 
kuruman said:
I cannot interpret what | Ly> might mean. The symbol for an operator is not normally placed inside a ket. Since there is handwriting involved, is it possible that you are asked to find the expectation value < Ly>? That makes more sense.

sorry for the confusion, what i mean is L[tex]_{y}[/tex]| 〉 i am going to try it out myself and post here my answer when finish.
 
Now that makes sense.
 
JayKo said:
Consider a system with total angular momentum, l=1 in the state

|[tex]\psi[/tex]>=[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1>-\frac{1}{2}|0>+\frac{1}{2}|-1>[/tex]
find |[tex]^{^}L_{\psi}>[/tex]
...it shoud be L subsript y not psi. just couldn't read the handwriting

If you mean <L_y>, then you compute the matrix element
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1/\sqrt{2} & -1/2 & 1/2 \end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> ... & ... & ...\\<br /> ... & ... & ...\\<br /> ... & ... & ...\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} <br /> 1/\sqrt{2}\\<br /> -1/2\\<br /> 1/2<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex] where the matrix is that of L_y in the 3x3 representation (spin 1). Otherwise, don't know what you meant.
 
alright here is my solution, please comment.

[tex]L_{\pm}=L_{x}+iL_{y}[/tex]
[tex]L_{\pm}|l,m>=\hbar\sqrt{(l_{\mp}m)(l_{\pm}m+1)}|l,m_{\pm}1>[/tex]

[tex]L_{y}=(L_{+}-L{-})/2i[/tex]

[tex]L_{y}=<\psi|L_{y}|\psi>=\frac{1}{2i}[<\psi|L_{+}|\psi>-<\psi|L_{-}|\psi>][/tex]
[tex]=\frac{1}{2i}[\hbar\sqrt{(l_{\mp}m)(l_{\pm}m+1)}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[<1|L_{+}|1>-\frac{1}{2}<0|L_{+}|0>+\frac{1}{2}<-1|L_{+}|-1><br /> -\hbar\sqrt{(l_{\mp}m)(l_{\pm}m+1)}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}]<1|L_{-}|1>-<br /> \frac{1}{2}<0|L_{-}|0>+\frac{1}{2}<-1|L_{-}|-1>]][/tex]
[tex]=\frac{1}{2i}[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<1|2>-\frac{1}{2}<0|1>+\frac{1}{2}<-1|0>][/tex]
[tex]-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[<1|0>+\frac{1}{2}<0|-1>-\frac{1}{2}<-1|-2>]=0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
latentcorpse said:
i've done no work in like four months for summer but am going back soon so can somebody tell me if I've done this correctly please.

say we wanted to find [itex]<L_y=1>[/itex], we would do:

[itex]<L_y=1>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^{\star} \cdot 1 \cdot \psi dx=\int_{-1}^{1} \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4} dx[/itex] where i have used the orthogonality of the kets.

and so [itex]<L_y=1>=\int_{-1}^{1} dx = \frac{x^2}{2} |_{x=-1}^{x=1}=0[/itex]

well that's definitely wrong. I am pretty sure i can't just change the limits from infinity to 1 etc in this case. jeez i need to get some work done in the next couple of weeks to get back up to speed lol.

interesting this is another solution, beside my way of doing it
 
  • #11
JayKo said:
alright here is my solution, please comment.
[tex]L_{\pm}|l,m>=\hbar\sqrt{(l_{\mp}m)(l_{\pm}m+1)}|l,m_{\pm}1>[/tex]

Is there a reason why you've written the [itex]\pm[/itex] as subscripts on the RHS?...Surely you mean

[tex]L_{\pm}|l,m\rangle=\hbar\sqrt{(l\mp m)(l \pm m+1)}|l,m \pm 1\rangle[/tex]

Right?

[tex]L_{y}=<\psi|L_{y}|\psi>=\frac{1}{2i}[<\psi|L_{+}|\psi>-<\psi|L_{-}|\psi>][/tex]

First, [itex]L_y[/itex] is just an operator, [itex]\langle L_y\rangle=\langle\psi\vert\L_y\vert\psi\rangle[/itex] is its expectation value.

Secondly, why are you calculating the expectation value? I thought you said the problem asked you to calculate [itex]L_y\vert\psi\rangle[/tex]...<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> [tex]=\frac{1}{2i}[\hbar\sqrt{(l_{\mp}m)(l_{\pm}m+1)}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{ 2}}[<1|L_{+}|1>-\frac{1}{2}<0|L_{+}|0>+\frac{1}{2}<-1|L_{+}|-1><br /> -\hbar\sqrt{(l_{\mp}m)(l_{\pm}m+1)}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{ 2}}]<1|L_{-}|1>-<br /> \frac{1}{2}<0|L_{-}|0>+\frac{1}{2}<-1|L_{-}|-1>]][/tex] </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> You need to be careful here, the states [itex]|0\rangle[/itex], [itex]|1\rangle[/itex] and [itex]|-1\rangle[/itex] correspond to the different values of [itex]m[/itex], so the coefficient [itex]\sqrt{(l\mp m)(l \pm m+1)}[/itex] will have different values when [itex]L_y[/itex] operates on each state. For example, <br /> <br /> [tex]L_+\vert0\rangle=\hbar\sqrt{(1-0)(1+ 0+1)}|1,0+1\rangle=\sqrt{2}\hbar|1,1\rangle[/tex]<br /> <br /> while<br /> <br /> [tex]L_+\vert1\rangle=\hbar\sqrt{(1-1)(1+ 1+1)}|1,1+1\rangle=0[/tex].<br /> <br /> You also need to operate on the state [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] with [itex]L_y[/itex], <b>before</b> you multiply by [itex]\langle\psi|=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\langle1|-\frac{1}{2}\langle0|+\frac{1}{2}\langle-1|[/itex] and distribute the different inner products. For example,<br /> <br /> [tex]\left(\langle0|+\langle1|\right)L_{-}\left(|0\rangle+|1\rangle\right)=\langle0|L_{-}|0\rangle+\langle0|L_{-}|1\rangle+\langle1|L_{-}|0\rangle+\langle1|L_{-}|1\rangle\neq\langle0|L_{-}|0\rangle+\langle1|L_{-}|1\rangle[/tex][/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #12
latentcorpse said:
bleh...it's going to be a long road back.

ok try this:

[itex]<\psi^{\star}|L_y|\psi>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^{\star} L_y \psi dx[/itex]

when we dot product [itex]\psi^{\star}[/itex] and [itex]\psi[/itex] we get 1 though due to ket orthogonality.
what value do I use for [itex]L_y[/itex]?
do the limits change due to the allowed values for [itex]L_y[/itex]?

thanks for your help.

First, the integral on the RHS is what you get when you expand [itex]\psi[/itex], [itex]\psi^*[/itex] and [itex]L_y[/itex] in the x-basis...if you don't know what those expanded versions are, there is not much point in using this method.

Second, [itex]L_y[/itex] operates on [itex]\psi(x)[/itex] before you take the product with [itex]\psi^*[/itex], so unless the effect of the operator is to simply multiply by a scalar (say,[itex]\alpha[/itex] ), you can't
say that [itex]\oint\psi^*(x)L_y\psi(x)dx=\alpha\oint \psi^*(x)\psi(x)dx[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #13
gabbagabbahey said:
Is there a reason why you've written the [itex]\pm[/itex] as subscripts on the RHS?...Surely you mean

[tex]L_{\pm}|l,m\rangle=\hbar\sqrt{(l\mp m)(l \pm m+1)}|l,m \pm 1\rangle[/tex]

Right?
First, [itex]L_y[/itex] is just an operator, [itex]\langle L_y\rangle=\langle\psi\vert\L_y\vert\psi\rangle[/itex] is its expectation value.

Secondly, why are you calculating the expectation value? I thought you said the problem asked you to calculate [itex]L_y\vert\psi\rangle[/tex]...<br /> You need to be careful here, the states [itex]|0\rangle[/itex], [itex]|1\rangle[/itex] and [itex]|-1\rangle[/itex] correspond to the different values of [itex]m[/itex], so the coefficient [itex]\sqrt{\sqrt{(l\mp m)(l \pm m+1)}} will have different values when [itex]L_y[/itex] operates on each state. For example, <br /> <br /> [tex]L_+\vert0\rangle=\hbar\sqrt{(1-0)(1+ 0+1)}|1,0+1\rangle=\sqrt{2}\hbar|1,1\rangle[/tex]<br /> <br /> while<br /> <br /> [tex]L_+\vert1\rangle=\hbar\sqrt{(1-1)(1+ 1+1)}|1,1+1\rangle=0[/tex].<br /> <br /> You also need to operate on the state [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] with [itex]L_y[/itex], <b>before</b> you multiply by [itex]\langle\psi|=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\langle1|-\frac{1}{2}\langle0|+\frac{1}{2}\langle-1|[/itex] and distribute the different inner products. For example,<br /> <br /> [tex]\left(\langle0|+\langle1|\right)L_{-}\left(|0\rangle+|1\rangle\right)=\langle0|L_{-}|0\rangle+\langle0|L_{-}|1\rangle+\langle1|L_{-}|0\rangle+\langle1|L_{-}|1\rangle\neq\langle0|L_{-}|0\rangle+\langle1|L_{-}|1\rangle[/tex][/itex][/itex]
[itex][itex] <br /> thank for the thorough explanation,<br /> to answer part 1, the +/- at RHS is not a subscript, the latex formatted it that, it doesn't meant to be. after reading your code, i understand how to format it already.<br /> <br /> part II, i am calculating the expectation value, not the <br /> [itex]L_y\vert\psi\rangle[/itex]. as i read the question wrongly (it was a handwritten one)<br /> <br /> part III, the operation is distributive.Noted. thanks for the good effort ;)[/itex][/itex]
 
  • #14
thanks a lot. had a look over some notes from last year as well as your reply - helped a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K