Is the QM phase of a particle a coincidence in relativistic quantum mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The QM phase of a single particle in three dimensions is defined as (r•p – Et), where r and p represent the position and momentum vectors, respectively. This relationship is not a coincidence but a fundamental aspect of relativistic quantum mechanics, applicable to all relativistic waves, including classical electromagnetic (EM) waves. The classical EM wave is expressed as E exp[i(k•r - ωt)], demonstrating that the phase of a field is Lorentz invariant and that the four-vector (ω, k) is covariant. This connection is rooted in the relativistic wave equation, which aligns with the Schrödinger equation in the non-relativistic limit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic quantum mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with classical electromagnetic theory
  • Knowledge of four-vectors in physics
  • Basic grasp of wave equations and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz invariance in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the derivation of the relativistic wave equation
  • Investigate the relationship between the Schrödinger equation and relativistic wave equations
  • Examine Maxwell's Equations in the context of relativistic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the intersection of relativity and quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
359
Reaction score
33
The QM phase of a single particle traveling freely in 3 dimensions is (rp – Et), where r and p are the 3-D position and momentum vectors. This is also the dot product of the space-time four-vector (r,-t) with the Energy-Momentum four-vector (p,E)

Is this "coincidence" related to relativistic QM?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. It is not a coincidence. It is the case in any relativistic wave, including classical EM.
 
clem said:
No. It is not a coincidence. It is the case in any relativistic wave, including classical EM.
What classical EM equation(s) contain this term? I looked at the original version of Maxwell's Equations and could not see any connection. Thanks.
 
A classical EM wave is {\bf E}\exp[i({\bf k\cdot r}-\omega t)].
 
It is a consequence of the fact that relativistic fields satisfies the relativistic wave equation which in the non-relativistic limit gives the Schrödinger eq, and of the de Broglie relation: E = \hbar \omega, p = \hbar k. As a consequence the phase of a field is Lorentz invariant and the four-vector (\omega, k) is covariant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
996
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K