Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the physical significance of the expression (p.r - Et) in the context of special relativity (SR) and its relation to the de Broglie relation. Participants explore whether this expression, which is the Minkowski inner product of four-vectors, has any deeper implications in SR, particularly regarding action and angular momentum.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants note that the expression (p.r - Et) is Lorentz invariant and question its physical significance in SR.
- Others argue that the wave function can be valid in both relativistic and non-relativistic contexts, depending on the chosen dispersion relation.
- A participant suggests that the expression might relate to a different kind of relativistic action, seeking to understand its commonality in knowledge.
- Some participants assert that the expression is merely a mathematical coincidence without physical significance, comparing it to wave functions in different theoretical frameworks.
- There is a contention regarding the nature of the inner product, with some insisting it involves a 4-vector and a 4-covector, rather than two 4-vectors.
- A later reply emphasizes the connection between action and the Lagrangian, discussing how action is invariant and fundamental in both classical and relativistic contexts.
- Another participant expresses uncertainty about their understanding of the topic, indicating a lack of clarity on the implications of the discussion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the physical significance of the expression (p.r - Et) and its implications in SR. There is no consensus on whether it holds any deeper meaning or is simply a mathematical artifact.
Contextual Notes
Some discussions involve assumptions about the definitions of vectors and covectors, as well as the nature of the Minkowski inner product, which may not be universally agreed upon. The exploration of action and its invariance also introduces complexities that remain unresolved.