QM: Spin -orbit coupling: Solve [(L.S), L]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aaronse_r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupling Qm Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving specific commutators related to spin-orbit coupling as presented in Griffiths problem 6.16. The primary commutators to solve include [(L.S), L], [(L.S), S], and [(L.S), L^2]. Key rules utilized in the solutions are the commutation relations [L_i,L_j]=ε_{ijk}L_k and [L_i,S_j]=0, along with the general rule [A,B,C]=A[B,C]+[A,C]B. The participants successfully derive the solutions by applying these established commutation relations and rules.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically angular momentum operators.
  • Familiarity with commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Griffiths' textbook on quantum mechanics.
  • Basic proficiency in manipulating algebraic expressions involving operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of spin-orbit coupling in quantum systems.
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as perturbation theory.
  • Review examples of solving commutators in quantum mechanics for deeper understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, particularly those tackling problems involving angular momentum and spin-orbit coupling, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts for their students.

Aaronse_r
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] QM: Spin -orbit coupling: Solve [(L.S), L]

Homework Statement


Griffiths problem 6.16
Solve the following commutators (he lists a bunch but i can't get even the first one)

(a) [(L.S) , L]
(b) [(L.S) , S]
(c) [(L.S) , L^2]

there's a few more, but i think if i get the idea then i can do the rest. I know it isn't supposed to be hard but for some reason i can't get it.

Thank you any help you can give.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only thing you have to know is the commutators

[tex][L_i,L_j]=\epsilon_{ijk}\,L_k \quad [L_i,S_j]=0[/tex]

and the general rule

[tex][A\,B,C]=A\,[B,C]+[A,C]\,B[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K