MHB QR Decomposition and Full Column Rank of A

gucci1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I have a problem where I am supposed to prove that R is nonsingular iff A is of full column rank in a QR decomposition.

I feel like I fully understand the two major processes for obtaining a QR decomposition (Gram-Schimdt and Householder Transformations), however, I am not entirely sure how to prove this problem.

I know that the only way that R is singular is if one or more of its diagonal values is zero, and this would only happen if the Householder matrix at some step transforms the current column into the zero vector instead of a constant times e1 (the first column of the identity).

Does anyone have suggestions for how to start proving this? I really don't even know what my first step is :-/ Thanks for any help you can offer,

gucci
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gucci said:
Hey guys,

I have a problem where I am supposed to prove that R is nonsingular iff A is of full column rank in a QR decomposition.

I feel like I fully understand the two major processes for obtaining a QR decomposition (Gram-Schimdt and Householder Transformations), however, I am not entirely sure how to prove this problem.

I know that the only way that R is singular is if one or more of its diagonal values is zero, and this would only happen if the Householder matrix at some step transforms the current column into the zero vector instead of a constant times e1 (the first column of the identity).

Does anyone have suggestions for how to start proving this? I really don't even know what my first step is :-/ Thanks for any help you can offer,

gucci

Hi gucci!

A matrix is singular iff it has an eigenvalue that is zero.

And a triangular matrix has its eigenvalues is on its diagonal.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top