Quake in China may have killed scores

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The April 20, 2013 earthquake in Sichuan, China, registered a magnitude of 6.6 according to the U.S. Geological Survey, while the state-run China News Service reported potential casualties exceeding 100. The quake's shallow depth of 12 kilometers intensified its impact, likely occurring on the Longmenshan fault, which was also responsible for the devastating 2008 Sichuan earthquake. This seismic event reflects ongoing tectonic stresses from the convergence of the India plate and the Eurasia plate, which is a significant factor in the region's seismic activity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of seismic measurement scales, specifically the Richter and moment magnitude scales.
  • Knowledge of tectonic plate dynamics, particularly the India and Eurasia plates.
  • Familiarity with geological fault types, especially reverse faults.
  • Awareness of historical seismic events in Sichuan province, including the 2008 earthquake.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Longmenshan fault and its historical seismic activity.
  • Study the tectonic interactions between the India and Eurasia plates.
  • Examine the effects of shallow earthquakes on urban areas and infrastructure.
  • Explore seismic risk assessment methodologies for regions prone to earthquakes.
USEFUL FOR

Geologists, seismologists, disaster response planners, and anyone involved in earthquake preparedness and risk management in seismically active regions.

Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,114
Reaction score
3,277
Another earthquake.

A state-run China News Service, quoting unnamed local media, said more than 100 people may have been killed or hurt in the earthquake.

The seismological bureau initially measured the quake at magnitude-7, while the U.S. Geological Survey recorded it at 6.6-magnitude, powerful enough to cause severe damage. Its depth was shallow, less than 13 kilometers or 8 miles, which could magnify the impact.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57580556/quake-in-china-may-have-killed-scores/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000gcdd#summary

BBC Reports: China earthquake: 'Hundreds dead or injured' in Sichuan
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-22228225

It was at a depth of 12km (7.6 miles), so lots ot energy at the surface.

USGS said:
Tectonic Summary
The April 20, 2013 UTC Mw6.6 earthquake in the Sichuan province of China occurred as the result of east-west oriented reverse-type motion on a north-south striking fault. A preliminary source location suggest the event likely occurred on the Longmenshan fault or a tectonically related fault at a depth of 12km. The Longmenshan fault was the source fault of the May 12, 2008 Mw7.9 Sichuan earthquake. The preliminary April 20 event location is approximately 85km from the hypocentral location of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. The April 20 earthquake reflects tectonic stresses resulting from the convergence of crustal material slowly moving from the high Tibetan Plateau, to the west, against strong crust underlying the Sichuan Basin and southeastern China.

On a continental scale, the seismicity of central and eastern Asia is a result of northward convergence of the India plate against the Eurasia plate with a velocity of about 50 mm/y. The convergence of the two plates is broadly accommodated by the uplift of the Asian highlands and by the motion of crustal material to the east away from the uplifted Tibetan Plateau.

Four events of Mw6.0 or greater have occurred within 200km of the April 19 event in the past 40 years, including the May 2008 Sichuan earthquake and a subsequent aftershock. The northwestern margin of the Sichuan Basin has previously experienced destructive earthquakes. The magnitude 7.5 earthquake of August 25, 1933, killed more than 9,300 people, while the May 12, 2008 killed 69,197.

. . . .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2K ·
60
Replies
2K
Views
463K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K