Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 22,399
- 7,253
Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 was a BWR/4 type with a gross electrical power generation of 784 MWe gross, 760 MWe net (so about 24 MWe used by the plant). Units 2, 3, 4 and 5 were much the same design, and apparently not uprated.Sotan said:I hope that little piece of debris is not being considered representative for the whole deposit at the bottom of the PCV - what was it, 200 tons plus?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant
The Fukushima BWR/4s would have 560 assemblies in the core, and I believe each assembly has about 180 kg of fuel (which could be in terms of U metal), about about 200 kg of fuel (UO2) + structural materials like Zircaloy-2 (~46 kg Zr-2, not including channels/shrouds), stainless steel (~6.7 kg), and Inconel (incidental).
Estimating about 270 kg/assy x 560 assy/core, one has 151,200 kg (or 151 tonne) in the core, excluding core support structures.
The limited sampling can only give a clue as to what might have happened. It there is little or no U (and Np, Pu), then one is left with mostly stainless steel and/or Zr. If there is little or no Zr, then one is left with stainless steel. All metals are probably oxidized. I think they will look for metals that are characteristic of fuel, cladding and stainless steel structures, in order to determine where the sample originated, or what it represents. If they find some fission products, e.g., Ru, Rh, . . . . , then that would be from the fuel.
More samples are needed, but at least, TEPCO was successful in retrieving a sample, however small.
FYI - Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 2
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00295450.2019.1704581#abstract
Last edited: