Quantum Coherence - Decoherence Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between quantum coherence and decoherence, particularly how the collective behavior of entangled particles influences classical objects. As the number of entangled particles increases, their observable quantum properties diminish, leading to a collapse of the position-space wavefunction. This raises the question of whether a classical object, such as a baseball, possesses a single measurable momentum-space wavefunction, which is clarified by noting that while individual particle wavefunctions may exhibit uncertainty, these uncertainties effectively cancel out on a macroscopic scale, resulting in negligible extensions in both position and momentum for the baseball.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with the uncertainty principle in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of quantum decoherence and its implications for macroscopic objects.
  • Basic grasp of wavefunctions and their role in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the Wikipedia article on quantum decoherence for a comprehensive understanding.
  • Explore the implications of the uncertainty principle on macroscopic objects in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the concept of wavefunction collapse and its relation to classical physics.
  • Study the behavior of multi-particle quantum systems and their coherence properties.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of quantum theory and its implications for classical objects.

burke142
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I understand that as the number of entangled particles increases, observable quantum mechanical properties decrease to the extent that the mass of particles collectively loses its wave-particle character and behaves classically.

In other words, the particles' collective position-space wavefunction is effectively collapsed.

My question is this: if a classical object is functionally a collapsed position-space wavefunction, doesn't the uncertainty principle hold that the object would have a correspondingly expanded momentum-space wavefunction?

If so, would a classical object, let's say a baseball, have a single measurable momentum space wavefunction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
burke142 said:
My question is this: if a classical object is functionally a collapsed position-space wavefunction, doesn't the uncertainty principle hold that the object would have a correspondingly expanded momentum-space wavefunction?

If so, would a classical object, let's say a baseball, have a single measurable momentum space wavefunction?
A wave function of a macroscopic object such as baseball will be extended in both position and momentum. The point is that both extensions are negligibly small when compared with the size of the object and average momentum of the object. So for all practical purposes you may pretend that there is no extension at all.
 
burke142 said:
If so, would a classical object, let's say a baseball, have a single measurable momentum space wavefunction?

Only if the wave functions of all the individual particles are coherent - but of course they aren't, which is why we call it "decoherence".

[warning! - what follows is a very handwavy and semi-classical way of thinking about a multi-particle quantum system - do not build too much on top of it! Read the wikipedia article on quantum decoherence if you want the real thing!]

There is some uncertainty as to the position of each individual particle but on average the uncertainties cancel out. Some particles will be a bit to the left of where they "belong" and others a bit to the right, and at any given moment the numbers of both will be approximately equal so the baseball as a whole stays very close to its expected position with a very high probability.

How high? Well, the baseball contains something on the order of ##10^{25}## atoms and the probability of them all randomly "deciding" to be a noticeable distance to the left at the same time is on the order of ##2^{(-10^{25})}##, a number that is unimaginably (quite literally - you can't imagine it) small.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
954
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K