Quantum Computing and the Infinite Salesmen Problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mukilab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of quantum computing to the Infinite Salesman Problem, specifically how qubits and superposition can potentially solve complex routing problems more efficiently than classical computers. Participants clarify that while quantum computers can process multiple possibilities simultaneously, they do not provide instant solutions to NP-complete problems like the traveling salesman problem. The conversation highlights the necessity of multiple qubits and the role of entanglement and superposition in quantum algorithms, emphasizing that quantum speedup requires more than just superposition. Misconceptions about quantum computing's capabilities are addressed, particularly regarding the nature of superposition and the limitations of current quantum algorithms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, particularly qubits and superposition.
  • Familiarity with NP-complete problems and classical algorithms.
  • Knowledge of quantum algorithms, including Grover's algorithm and Shor's algorithm.
  • Basic grasp of quantum entanglement and its implications for quantum computing.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Quantum Computing Basics" to understand foundational concepts.
  • Study "Grover's Algorithm" for insights on search optimization in quantum computing.
  • Explore "Shor's Algorithm" for its application in factoring large numbers and implications for encryption.
  • Investigate "Quantum Entanglement" and its role in enhancing computational power.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, computer scientists, and software engineers interested in quantum computing applications, particularly in solving complex optimization problems and understanding the limitations of current quantum algorithms.

  • #31
You can define "0", "1" and its interpretation in any way you like, you just have to do it consistently in the preparation of the states and the interpretation of the results.

In a similar way, you can compute 2+4 on every conventional computer, and get 6 independent of the details of the implementation in hardware (or maybe 5.9999 with some bugged CPUs ;)).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K