I [Quantum Computing] Quantum Parallelism State Calculation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding quantum parallelism and the calculation of the resulting state in a quantum system. The user questions the normalization of the state, suggesting it should be a tensor product of two states, but recognizes a misunderstanding in the measurement implications. A recommendation is made to apply the operator over the four basis states to clarify the operator's function. This approach aims to help the user derive the final state correctly by utilizing linearity. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping quantum parallelism in quantum computing.
llha
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Nielsen and Chuang state calculation isn't the full tensor product? But a full tensor product would be useless to measure?
Hi, I'm going through Nielsen and Chuang's Quantum Computation and Quantum Information textbook and I don't really understand this part about quantum parallelism:
1626469417681.png


Shouldn't the resulting state be (1/sqrt(2^4)) * (|0, f(0)> + |0, f(1)> + |1, f(1)> + |1, f(0)>), since the resulting state would be the (normalized) tensor product of (1/sqrt(2)) * (|0> + |1>) and (1/sqrt(2)) * (|f(0)> + f(1)>)?

I understand that would be pretty useless to measure, so I know I'm wrong, but I don't understand where I'm going wrong. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A state of two qubits can be written in the base ##\left|00\right>, \left|01\right>, \left|10\right>, \left|11\right>##. I would recommend you to apply the operator over these 4 states such that you really understand how the operator works, after that you can write the initial state as a linear combination of those states and use linearity and the previous result to get the final state.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K