Quantum double slits moving past a quantum particle?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Leopolitan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of quantum double slits and their potential to create a carrier interference pattern when interacting with quantum particles. Participants explore the concept of "carrier interference patterns" and the relevance of hydrodynamic quantum theory, particularly in relation to Bohmian mechanics. The conversation emphasizes the need for rigorous scientific discourse, steering clear of personal speculation, and highlights the challenges in experimentally testing different interpretations of quantum mechanics, as they yield identical predictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically double slit experiments.
  • Familiarity with hydrodynamic quantum theory and its relation to Bohmian mechanics.
  • Knowledge of quantum interference patterns and their implications in physics.
  • Awareness of the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics interpretations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "hydrodynamic quantum field theory" and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the principles of "Bohmian mechanics" and its interpretations of quantum phenomena.
  • Explore the concept of "pilot waves" and their role in quantum theory.
  • Investigate the differences between various interpretations of quantum mechanics and their experimental predictions.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the interpretations of quantum theory and the implications of quantum experiments.

Leopolitan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Relative double slit experiment
Open question: Can we be sure that a quantum model double slit doesn't create a carrier interference pattern around the slits, in the fields, already there? Relativity is such a big deal in physics but so many models only consider seemingly weird quantum particles going through normal classical slits. Maybe things make more sense when we imagine quantum slits moving toward a quantum particle and vice versa. Let's think relatively!
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
Leopolitan said:
Can we be sure that a quantum model double slit doesn't create a carrier interference pattern around the slits

What does "a carrier interference pattern" mean?

Leopolitan said:
Maybe things make more sense when we imagine quantum slits moving toward a quantum particle

What difference would "quantum slits" make?

Do you have a reference for a model that has any of these features? Or are you just making it up? Personal speculation is not allowed here.
 
Sorry, getting used to the rules. The paper below discusses pilot carrier waves in terms of hydrodynamics.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343581035_Hydrodynamic_Quantum_Field_Theory_The_Onset_of_Particle_Motion_and_the_Form_of_the_Pilot_Wave

I see your point about wanton speculation. Where does one raise such discussions without ending up talking to metaphysical types?
 
Leopolitan said:
The paper below discusses pilot carrier waves in terms of hydrodynamics.

"Hydrodynamics" here means "hydrodynamic quantum theory", which is more or less a version of Bohmian mechanics. So this thread really belongs in the interpretations forum, and I will move it.

Leopolitan said:
Where does one raise such discussions without ending up talking to metaphysical types?

QM interpretations can be discussed in the interpretations forum (where this thread will be moved in a moment).

Personal speculation cannot be discussed anywhere on PF.
 
Moderator's note: Thread moved to QM interpretations forum.
 
Leopolitan said:
Can we be sure that a quantum model double slit doesn't create a carrier interference pattern around the slits, in the fields, already there?

If hydrodynamic quantum theory is just an alternative interpretation of QM, which is what it appears to be (it doesn't change any of the experimental predictions, it just tells a different story about what is going on behind the scenes, so to speak), then there is no way to experimentally test it against other interpretations, since all interpretations make the same experimental predictions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K