Quantum Field as Physical Entity?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of quantum field theory (QFT) as a physical entity, arguing that quantum particles lack independent reality and that only the quantum field possesses physical substance. It critiques the traditional distinction between matter and fields, suggesting that this separation is outdated and that a unified view of quantum fields should be adopted. Participants express curiosity about the implications of non-locality in quantum fields and its potential conflicts with relativity, particularly regarding information transfer. The conversation also touches on the mathematical constructs of quantum theory and their physical interpretations, questioning the reality of wave packets prior to measurement. Overall, the thread seeks to explore the foundational aspects of QFT and its philosophical implications.
  • #31
Delta Kilo said:
Regarding free will, I'm not sure what it is supposed to mean in the context of physics, so I take it to be the same as "true randomness".
For me, free will is totally different from true randomness. But you are right that free will is not well defined in the context of physics.

Anyway, today appeared a possibly interesting paper on that issue:
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1202.2007
I have not yet read the paper, but I plan to do that in a near future.

Delta Kilo said:
Personally I like deterministic frozen block-multiverse, but that's just me.
Me too.

Delta Kilo said:
Regarding time as operator: this is something I don't get. Operators are intimately connected with measurements.
Well, if you define operators that way, then fine. But operators are usually defined as mathematical objects satisfying certain algebraic properties, which a priori have nothing to do with measurements.

Delta Kilo said:
We don't know how brain works, true, but we don't know a lot about what computers are really capable of doing either (like is P=NP?).
I think we understand computers much much better than the brain.

Delta Kilo said:
Regarding time-travel paradoxes etc: if we assume a) 4D block universe and b) that perceived subjective time flows along the worldline in the direction of increasing entropy, then there are no paradoxes at all. There would be stagnation points instead where the entropy reaches maximum. Observer moving from this stagnation point into either direction along the worldline won't remember anything at all, so I guess this would be it for him.
I agree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
303
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
470
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
487
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K