Undergrad Quantum field theory: an informative approach

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding accessible books about quantum field theory (QFT) that avoid complex mathematics. While Brian Greene's works are praised for their readability, it's noted that understanding quantum theory typically requires some mathematical background. Martinus Veltman's "Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics" is recommended for its approachable style, despite its unconventional presentation of QFT concepts. Additionally, Veltman's "Diagrammatica" is mentioned as a more technical resource that remains comprehensible with basic knowledge of quantum mechanics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the challenge of simplifying QFT while maintaining scientific integrity.
gtorassa
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Looking for a book that tries to explain the basis of quantum field theory in an informative approach, without complex formulas but with the spirit used by Brian Greene for his fantastic The Elegant Universe
I'm looking for a book that describes the quantum field theory without going deeply in the theory with formulas or complex description of the mathematics under the theory.
I know that this theory is really complex and it needs a deep knowledge of quantum physics in order to be understood.
But Brian Green succeeded in writing a book about String Theory for everybody, I'm wondering if such a book exists for quantum field theory too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Brian Greene's books are indeed fantastic but everything else than good textbooks about physics. You cannot understand quantum theory without math. A much more honest approach to make QT as simple as possible but not simpler is Susskinds corresponding volume in the "Theoretical Minimum" series.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and gtorassa
gtorassa said:
Looking for a book that tries to explain the basis of quantum field theory in an informative approach, without complex formulas but with the spirit used by Brian Greene for his fantastic The Elegant Universe

Here is a fantastic book about quantum field theory, fully featuring the Vacuum Fluctuation Myth (the fantasy about QFT intended solely for lay people):
In the Introduction, he writes:
Martinus Veltman said:
we cannot assume the reader to be familiar with the mathematical methods of quantum mechanics, so he will have to swallow strange facts without the support of equations.
... not only strange facts but also strange fiction!

Veltman won in 1999 the Nobel prize for physics for much more serious work. He also wrote a serious textbook on quantum field theory,
which is free of virtual particle fantasy, featuring instead a valid formal approach - but it is therefore a bit more difficult to understand. This technically precise (though not mathematically rigorous) book contains not a single mention of the word 'fluctuation' or ‘virtual’. In the Introduction, he writes:
Martinus Veltman said:
No one should have an excuse not understanding this book. Knowing about ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics and classical relativity one should be able to understand the reasoning.
This much to your excuse...
gtorassa said:
I know that this theory is really complex and it needs a deep knowledge of quantum physics in order to be understood.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes gtorassa and vanhees71
A book about physics promising "mysteries" is usually not worth the paper it's printed on...
 
Three books and a video, now I can't say I don't have something to read at night :biggrin:
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
998
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K