Quantum Field Theory-Gauge Transformations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on gauge transformations in Quantum Field Theory, specifically analyzing the Lagrangian density L(φμ) = -1/2(∂μφν)(∂μφν) + 1/2(∂μφμ)² + m²/2(φμφμ). Participants explore the introduction of an additional scalar field σ and the formulation of an interacting Lagrangian L' = L(φμ) + L²(φμ, σ) that maintains gauge invariance. The challenge lies in determining if parts (c) and (d) can be solved systematically rather than through trial and error.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory concepts
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of gauge transformations
  • Experience with scalar fields and their interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gauge invariance in Quantum Field Theory
  • Study the construction of interacting Lagrangians
  • Learn about canonical kinetic terms for scalar fields
  • Explore systematic methods for solving Lagrangian equations
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on Quantum Field Theory and gauge invariance. It provides insights into constructing Lagrangians and understanding scalar field interactions.

jameson2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the Lagrangian density L(\phi^{\mu})=-\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi^{\nu})(\partial^{\mu}\phi_{\nu}) + \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi^{\mu})^2+\frac{m^2}{2}(\phi^{\mu}\phi_{\mu})
and gauge transformation \phi^{\mu}\rightarrow \phi^{\mu} + \partial^{\mu}\alpha

(c) Introduce one extra real scalar field \sigma and write some interacting Lagrangian L^{\prime}=L(\phi^{\mu})+L^2(\phi^{\mu},\sigma) which is invariant under the gauge transformation and gives the original L for \sigma=0.

(d) Can we solve (c) with sigma that has a canonical kinetic term -\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\sigma)^2

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


The first parts of the question show that \partial_{\mu}\phi^{\mu}=0 which simplifies the Lagrangian, and also that the initial Lagrangian is not invariant under the gauge transformation. I got those out.
But parts (c) and (d) seems like the kind of thing you either know or you don't, is there a way of working it out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bumping this because I would also like to know if (c) and (d) can be solved in a way that doesn't involve trial and error or just knowing the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K