Quantum harmonics oscillator at high temperature

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of the quantum harmonic oscillator at high temperatures, specifically addressing the energy expression and its implications for specific heat. Participants explore the limits of energy as temperature approaches infinity and the interpretation of infinity in physical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the energy of the harmonic oscillator and suggests that at high temperatures, the energy approaches kT, questioning the interpretation of infinity in this context.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the energy is never infinite for any finite temperature, arguing that limits must be considered when discussing infinity.
  • There is a challenge regarding the assertion that the energy approaches infinity as temperature approaches infinity, with participants discussing the implications for specific heat.
  • Some participants assert that specific heat remains nonzero for any finite temperature, regardless of how large it is, and that it can be evaluated using the finite energy expression.
  • Clarifications are made about the distinction between approaching a limit and actually reaching infinity, with references to literature that states energy approaches kT as temperature increases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the interpretation of energy at high temperatures, particularly whether it can be considered infinite. While some argue that energy approaches kT without ever being infinite, others question the implications of this limit on specific heat.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of discussing limits in the context of infinity, indicating that the mathematical treatment of energy and specific heat requires careful consideration of temperature behavior as it approaches extreme values.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello

The energy of harmonics oscillator, started of [tex]U=-\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \ln Z[/tex] is equal to [tex]\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1}[/tex].

At high temperature, i could say that [tex]exp (\beta \hbar \omega ) \approx 1 + (\beta \hbar \omega )[/tex], and then [tex]U=\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + kT[/tex], therefore at high temperature [tex]\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}[/tex] is negligible compared to [tex]kT[/tex], and then [tex]U \approx k T[/tex].

I need find arguments about why is incorrect say that [tex]\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1}[/tex] at [tex]\beta \to 0[/tex] (high temperature) is equal to [tex]\infty[/tex]. This motivated by the fact that [tex]k T = k \cdot \infty = \infty[/tex]. I understand that at high temperature the energy has a asyntote equal to kT (http://www.av8n.com/physics/oscillator.htm#sec-e-vs-t ), but still need argumens.

Also ¿why the harmonics oscillators need a specific heat at high temperature?. In this case the specific heat is equal to k. But if the energy us infinity, then the specific heat would be zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alejandrito29 said:
I need find arguments about why is incorrect say that [tex]\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1}[/tex] at [tex]\beta \to 0[/tex] (high temperature) is equal to [tex]\infty[/tex].

The precise statement would be that ##\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} + \frac{\hbar \omega}{exp(\beta \hbar \omega)-1} \to \infty## as ##\beta \to 0##. We always have to speak of limits when discussing infinity. Nothing ever equals infinity.

alejandrito29 said:
Also ¿why the harmonics oscillators need a specific heat at high temperature?. In this case the specific heat is equal to k. But if the energy us infinity, then the specific heat would be zero.

The energy is never infinity. For any finite temperature, no matter how large, the energy is finite. So you can always evaluate the specific heat ##d U / d T## and it is always nonzero, for any ##T > 0##.
 
The_Duck said:
The energy is never infinity. For any finite temperature, no matter how large, the energy is finite. So you can always evaluate the specific heat ##d U / d T## and it is always nonzero, for any ##T > 0##.

¿why The energy is never infinity?

The_Duck said:
For any finite temperature, no matter how large, the energy is finite.

but the literature says that at [tex]T \to \infty[/tex] , then [tex]U \to k T[/tex]

sorry, but still i don´t understand
 
alejandrito29 said:
¿why The energy is never infinity?

Because nothign is ever infinite. This is why we have to talk about limits. This is as true here as in in every other case in math and physics.

but the literature says that at [tex]T \to \infty[/tex] , then [tex]U \to k T[/tex]

Which is correct, but does not mean that T ever EQUALS infinity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K