Quantum Mechanics and Eigenfunctions Checks

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around checking whether specific wave functions are eigenfunctions of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics. The original poster presents three wave functions and seeks to determine if they satisfy the eigenvalue equation associated with the momentum operator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of differentiating the wave functions to check for proportionality to the original functions. There is a focus on understanding the implications of boundary conditions and the relationship between sine and cosine functions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the differentiation process and the conditions for determining eigenstates. There is ongoing exploration of whether the results of differentiation can be expressed in terms of the original wave functions, and questions remain about the implications of complex numbers in the context of real eigenvalues.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the next steps in the process and the relevance of boundary conditions, indicating a need for clarification on these aspects. There is also a mention of the requirement for the eigenvalue to be a real number.

TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For each of the following wave functions check whether they are eigenfunctions of the momentum operator, ie whether they satisfy the eigenvalue equation:

[tex]\hat{p} \psi(x) = p\psi(x) with \hat{p} = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex] and p is a real number.

For those that are eigenfunctions, calculate the eigenvalue p, the expectation value〈[tex]\hat{p}[/tex]〉, and the standard deviation Δ[tex]\hat{p}[/tex] ̂.

(a)

[tex]\psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} cos(\frac{x\pi}{L}) for -L/2 \leq x \leqL/2[/tex]

0 for x > L/2, x < -L/2

(b)

[tex]\phi(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}e^{ikx} for 0 \leq x \leq L with k is real [\tex]<br /> <br /> 0 for x > L, x < 0<br /> <br /> <br /> (c)<br /> <br /> [tex]\chi (x) = 2xe^{-x} for 0 \leq x[/tex]<br /> 0 for x < 0<br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> N/A<br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> <br /> Okay, I have gone some way through the first part.<br /> <br /> [tex]\hat{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial}[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}cos\frac{x\pi}{L})[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(cos\frac{x\pi}{L})[/tex]<br /> <br /> With Limits between L/2 and -L/2<br /> <br /> [tex]-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} (-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{x\pi}{L})^{L/2}_{-L/2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} ([-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{L\pi}{2L}]-[-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{-L\pi}{2L}])[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} ([-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{\pi}{2}]-[-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{-\pi}{2}])[/tex]<br /> <br /> But I am unsure where I am supoosed to go from here...<br /> <br /> To show it is a Eigenfunction, I need to get rid of the i at the very begining, but I am unsure how to do this?<br /> <br /> Any suggesstions where to rpoceed?<br /> <br /> Thanks in advance,<br /> <br /> TFM[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not need the boundary conditions to check if a function is an eigenstate so no need to replace x by L/2 or -L/2. These limits only enter when you calculate the expectation values.


You must ask yourself if the function you get after applying [itex]i \hbar \partial_x[/itex] to [itex]\psi[/itex] is proportional to the wavefunction itself. If yes, then the wavefunction is an eigenstate and the constant of proportionality is the eigenvalue. If not, the function is not an eigenstate.
 
Last edited:
So do I need to differnitiate it then?
 
TFM said:
So do I need to differnitiate it then?

Yes. Sorry, there was a typo in my post and the partial derivative did not show up. Yes, you must apply [itex]i \hbar \partial_x[/itex] to [itex]\psi[/itex] and check if the result is proportional to the wavefunction itself. Is it possible to write [itex]\sin(\pi x/l)[/itex] as a constant times [itex]\cos (\pi x/L)[/itex] in such a way that the result will be valid for any value of x ? If the answer is no, then this wavefunction (the cos) is not an eigenstate of the momentum operator
 
Okay so the original wavefunction is:

[tex]\psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} cos(\frac{x\pi}{L})[/tex] --- (1)

The [tex]\hat{p}[/tex] function is:

[tex]-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} (-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{x\pi}{L})[/tex] Which can be simplified to:

[tex]i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} * \frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{x\pi}{L}[/tex]

So now I have to see if this result is proportional to (1).

So I have to find how to write [tex]sin(\frac{\pi x}{L})[/tex] as [tex]C cos(\frac{\pi x}{L})[/tex]

Can this actually be done, though, since the only relation I know that will link sin and cos is [tex]sin^2(\theta) + cos^2(\theta) = 1[/tex]?

Also, do I need to get rid of that i at the beginning, since p needs to be a real number?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K