Quantum mechanics book recommendations

  • Thread starter Thread starter hmparticle9
  • Start date Start date
hmparticle9
Messages
157
Reaction score
26
I am currently reading through "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths and I am loving it.

I am interested in book about quantum mechanics but an easy read. What I am getting at is that Griffiths is very math heavy and full of exercises, which is great. But I am getting lost in the maths most the time and the ideas of QM get lost.

I am after, therefore, an easy read I can go through the same time as reading Griffiths.

has anyone read "The New Quantum Universe - Tony Hey"?

The comments seem to love it, but some say it is out of date (pre-higgs boson)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmparticle9 said:
I am currently reading through "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths and I am loving it.

I am interested in book about quantum mechanics but an easy read. What I am getting at is that Griffiths is very math heavy and full of exercises, which is great. But I am getting lost in the maths most the time and the ideas of QM get lost.

I am after, therefore, an easy read I can go through the same time as reading Griffiths.

has anyone read "The New Quantum Universe - Tony Hey"?

The comments seem to love it, but some say it is out of date (pre-higgs boson)
I have seen Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum by Leonard Susskind and Art Friedman recommended as it is less math oriented.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and hmparticle9
A couple of popularizations that I like

Where does the Weirdness Go by Lindley
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465067867/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Sneaking a Look at God's Cards by Ghirardi
https://www.amazon.com/dp/069113037X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Other books

Feynman Vol 3
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/

I am not really familiar with it, but you might take a look at
Quantum Concepts in Physics by Longair
https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Conc...nderstanding/dp/1107017092/?tag=pfamazon01-20
His Theoretical Concepts in Physics is great.

It’s probably too advanced for you but
Laloe’s Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics is an interesting read.
https://www.amazon.com/Do-Really-Understand-Quantum-Mechanics/dp/1108477003/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Here is an early version
https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0209123
 
Last edited:
Is Griffiths your first exposure to quantum mechanics? If so, you might consider working through the chapters on modern physics in an introductory physics book. Or get a book on modern physics, like Tipler.

I don't think you'll find any popularizations of quantum mechanics to be helpful. They might be interesting and fun to read, but to really learn quantum mechanics, you need to learn/work through the math.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and hmparticle9
vela said:
Or get a book on modern physics, like Tipler
Plus 1 on Tipler. I loved that book, convinced me to major in physics!
 
@vela I guessed that was the case.
 
Anything below Griffiths would be about QM, but not QM. That's why they are easier.
 
  • Like
Likes hmparticle9
I will stuck to Griffiths.
 
  • #10
hmparticle9 said:
I am currently reading through "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths and I am loving it.

I am interested in book about quantum mechanics but an easy read. What I am getting at is that Griffiths is very math heavy and full of exercises, which is great. But I am getting lost in the maths most the time and the ideas of QM get lost.

I am after, therefore, an easy read I can go through the same time as reading Griffiths.

has anyone read "The New Quantum Universe - Tony Hey"?

The comments seem to love it, but some say it is out of date (pre-higgs boson)
If you are struggling with the mathematics of Griffiths, then you do not meet the math prerequisites. It is probably the most math hand wavy QM there is. Are you sure its the math and not having the physics chops?

Ie., jumping from say an intro mechanics understanding to an upper division QM book?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes PeroK and hmparticle9
  • #11
I am not struggling with the maths. I am okay with the physics. I just wanted an easy access collection of QM results to refer to. tbh I was not really thinking when posting this. Griffiths fits the bill. (post #8)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
944
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K