Quantum Mechanics is not a description of reality?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of quantum mechanics through the lens of Schrödinger's cat thought experiment. Participants argue that while quantum particles can exist in superposition, the concept of entanglement is misunderstood in the context of the experiment. The dominant interpretation asserts that particles lack definite states until measured, leading to paradoxes when considering multiple entangled systems. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn is that quantum mechanics may not accurately describe reality but rather our understanding of it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's cat thought experiment
  • Familiarity with quantum superposition and entanglement
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics principles
  • Concept of decoherence in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of quantum superposition in real-world applications
  • Explore the concept of quantum entanglement in detail
  • Research decoherence and its role in quantum mechanics
  • Examine contemporary interpretations of quantum mechanics beyond the Copenhagen interpretation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of quantum theory.

Clever Penguin
Messages
74
Reaction score
20
Consider a cat in a box in a room. The box also contains some radioactive isotope. A geiger counter detects if the atom decays, and if it does, it sends a signal to some sort of computer, which causes a hammer to fall and smash open a bottle of poisonous gas. So, if the atom decays, the cat is dead, but if it doesn’t, the cat remains alive.We cannot tell if the cat is dead or alive until we open the box, and the dominant interpretation of quantum mechanics states that particles can exist in two states at once, and has no definite state until we measure or observe it. This means that the atom can have both decayed and not decayed at the same time. This leads to to the conclusion that the cat is both dead and alive at the same time.Now consider another room with exactly the same setup as the one previously considered. We can entangle the two cats by linking the two computers and providing them with the command that only one cat can be killed. So, if the cat in the first room is killed, the cat in the second room cannot be. Someone in room one knows that the cat is either dead or alive, but does not know which, so must say that it is both dead and alive at the same time. He therefore knows that the cat in room 2 is also both dead and alive. By opening the box, he can find a live cat, but this does not provide information about the cat in room 2 since either that cat is alive, and neither atom has decayed, or the cat is dead, and this cat cannot be killed.But now consider that the cat is dead. This means that the cat in room 2 must be alive. The person in room 1, let's call him person 1, now knows the state of both cats. However, the person in room 2, person 2, has yet to open the box, so considers both cats to be dead and alive at the same time! This cannot be true, since person 1 knows that one of them is dead, and the other is alive. The only way around this is to say that quantum mechanics does not describe reality, but only our understanding of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clever Penguin said:
the dominant interpretation of quantum mechanics states that particles can exist in two states at once, and has no definite state until we measure or observe it.
You misunderstand the meaning of a state. A quantum system has always a well-defined (pure or mixed) state. A cat just has more states than only the states ''dead'' or ''alive'' - reality is far more complex.
 
Clever Penguin said:
Now consider another room with exactly the same setup as the one previously considered. We can entangle the two cats by linking the two computers and providing them with the command that only one cat can be killed.
This is not what entanglement means.

Your post displays so much misunderstanding that it will be difficult to build a constructive discussion out of it. You need to first understand contemporary quantum mechanics better. You will find many threads on PF describing how to think about Schrödinger's cat and decoherence.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K