Quantum Mechanics (potential well)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a potential well, specifically focusing on calculating probabilities of finding an electron in certain regions of the well for different energy states. The original poster seeks clarification on the correspondence principle and its implications in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations of probabilities for the ground state and the 99th excited state of an electron in a potential well. There are attempts to verify numerical values and expressions used in the calculations. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of negative probabilities and the limits of integration for specific regions within the well. The correspondence principle is also questioned in relation to the differences in probabilities for quantum and classical systems.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on calculations and exploring the implications of their results. Some guidance has been offered regarding the behavior of classical particles compared to quantum particles, particularly in terms of probability distributions. Multiple interpretations of the correspondence principle are being explored, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the specific limits of integration and the implications of the correspondence principle as the quantum number increases. There is also mention of homework rules that may affect the approach to the problem.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I need help mostly with part (c) of the following problem:

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6376/question5.jpg

Homework Equations



Schrödinger equations

Correspondence principle

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)

[itex]\int^{0.2}_0 |\psi|^2 \ dx = \int^{0.2}_0 \frac{2}{L}\sin^2 \left( \frac{\pi x}{L} \right) \ dx[/itex]

[itex]= \int^{0.2}_0 \frac{2}{2L} \left( 1-\frac{cos 2 \pi x}{L} \right) \ dx[/itex]

[itex]= \frac{1}{L} |x- \frac{L}{2 \pi} \sin \frac{2 \pi x}{L}|^{0.2}_0[/itex]

[itex]=0.15084[/itex]

(b) For the 99th excited energy state

[itex]\psi_{100} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} \sin \left( \frac{100 \pi x}{L} \right)[/itex]

[itex]= \int^{0.2}_0 \frac{2}{L} \sin^2 \left( \frac{100 \pi x}{L} \right) dx[/itex]

[itex]= \frac{1}{L} |x-\frac{L}{100 \pi} \times \sin \left( \frac{200\pi x}{L} \right)|^{0.2}_0[/itex]

[itex]=1.98346 \times 10^{-10}[/itex]

Hopefully my working so far is correct. And we can repeat the process in (a) and (b) for when the electron is within 0.100 nm of the centre of the well (x= 0.4).

(c) So, comparing my results from there is a greater probability of finding the electron within 0.2 nm of the left wall when it is in its ground state, than when it is in the 99th excited state. And the probability of finding a particle at a position is always less than one. So how does this illustrate the "correspondence principle"? I looked it up on wikipedia but I still don't know how to explain this. Also For a "classical electron" how exactly would the probabilities would be different? :confused:

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:
[itex]\int^{0.2}_0 |\psi|^2 \ dx = \int^{0.2}_0 \frac{2}{L}\sin^2 \left( \frac{\pi x}{L} \right) \ dx[/itex]

[itex]= \int^{0.2}_0 \frac{2}{2L} \left( 1-\frac{cos 2 \pi x}{L} \right) \ dx[/itex]

[itex]= \frac{1}{L} |x- \frac{L}{2 \pi} \sin \frac{2 \pi x}{L}|^{0.2}_0[/itex]

[itex]=0.15084[/itex]

Looks good except for the final numerical value. I get a somewhat larger value.

(b) For the 99th excited energy state

[itex]\psi_{100} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} \sin \left( \frac{100 \pi x}{L} \right)[/itex]

[itex]= \int^{0.2}_0 \frac{2}{L} \sin^2 \left( \frac{100 \pi x}{L} \right) dx[/itex]

[itex]= \frac{1}{L} |x-\frac{L}{100 \pi} \times \sin \left( \frac{200\pi x}{L} \right)|^{0.2}_0[/itex]

[itex]=1.98346 \times 10^{-10}[/itex]

Check the factor of 100 in the denominator of the second term in the last expression. Also, the numerical value is way off. You can get a good estimate for this case by noting that the large denominator in the second term makes that term very small compared to the first term. So, if you dropped the second term, the probability would just be x/L|[itex]^{.2}_{0}[/itex]

When thinking about the classical case, note that a classical particle would move at constant speed. So, if you divided the box into two equal halves, the particle would spend the same amount of time in each half. So, the probability of finding the particle in the left half would be 1/2. Likewise, if you divided the box into 5 equal parts, the particle would spend the same time in each part. So, the probability of finding the particle in anyone of those parts would be 1/5.
 
TSny said:
Looks good except for the final numerical value. I get a somewhat larger value.

Thank you. Oops, here's what I've got now:

[itex]\frac{1}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} ((0.2 \times 10^{-9}) - \frac{0.6 \times 10^{-9}}{2 \pi} \ sin \left( \frac{2 \pi (0.2 \times 10^{-9}))}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} \right)) = 0.1955025[/itex]

Check the factor of 100 in the denominator of the second term in the last expression. Also, the numerical value is way off. You can get a good estimate for this case by noting that the large denominator in the second term makes that term very small compared to the first term. So, if you dropped the second term, the probability would just be x/L|[itex]^{.2}_{0}[/itex]

Sorry. It should have been

[itex]= \frac{1}{L} \left( x- \frac{L}{200 \pi} \ sin \left( \frac{200 \pi x}{L} \right) \right)[/itex]

[itex]= \frac{1}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} \left((0.2 \times 10^{-9})- \frac{0.6 \times 10^{-9}}{200 \pi} \ sin \left( \frac{200 \pi (0.2 \times 10^{-9})}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} \right) \right) = 0.331955[/itex]

Now my results are different, when in the 99th excited state there is a higher probability of finding the electron there.

When thinking about the classical case, note that a classical particle would move at constant speed. So, if you divided the box into two equal halves, the particle would spend the same amount of time in each half. So, the probability of finding the particle in the left half would be 1/2. Likewise, if you divided the box into 5 equal parts, the particle would spend the same time in each part. So, the probability of finding the particle in anyone of those parts would be 1/5.

I see. Thank you for clarifying the way the classical electron would behave. But how does this, and the comparison of the results in part (a) and (b) illustrate the correspondence principle? :confused: I think the correspondence principle is supposed to relate how quantum mechanics is in agreement with classical mechanics on the macroscale but I am not sure how to relate it to the situation in this problem.
 
Last edited:
Also, in part (a) it asks to find the probability 'within 0.100 nm of the centre of the well (i.e., in the middle third of the well)'. However when I change the limit of integration I get a negative probability:

[itex]\psi_1 = \frac{1}{L} |x- \frac{L}{2 \pi} \sin \frac{2 \pi x}{L}|^{0.4}_0[/itex]

[itex]\frac{1}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} ((0.4 \times 10^{-9}) - \frac{0.6 \times 10^{-9}}{2 \pi} \ sin \left( \frac{2 \pi (0.4 \times 10^{-9}))}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} \right)) = -0.4395[/itex]

So, what does a negative probability mean? :confused:
 
roam said:
Also, in part (a) it asks to find the probability 'within 0.100 nm of the centre of the well (i.e., in the middle third of the well)'. However when I change the limit of integration I get a negative probability:

[itex]\psi_1 = \frac{1}{L} |x- \frac{L}{2 \pi} \sin \frac{2 \pi x}{L}|^{0.4}_0[/itex]

What should the lower integration limit really be here?

[itex]\frac{1}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} ((0.4 \times 10^{-9}) - \frac{0.6 \times 10^{-9}}{2 \pi} \ sin \left( \frac{2 \pi (0.4 \times 10^{-9}))}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} \right)) = -0.4395[/itex]

So, what does a negative probability mean? :confused:

[itex]\sin \left( \frac{2 \pi (0.4 \times 10^{-9})}{0.6 \times 10^{-9}} \right) = \sin \frac{4 \pi}{3} < 0[/itex]

So the entire expression cannot be negative.

As for the correspondence principle, observe that the probability expression has two terms: one linear and another oscillatory. Observe what happens with the coefficient at the oscillatory term as you go to the higher states. What does the entire expression tend to?
 
roam said:
I see. Thank you for clarifying the way the classical electron would behave. But how does this, and the comparison of the results in part (a) and (b) illustrate the correspondence principle? :confused: I think the correspondence principle is supposed to relate how quantum mechanics is in agreement with classical mechanics on the macroscale but I am not sure how to relate it to the situation in this problem.

For a problem like this, the correspondence principle implies that the quantum system should behave like a classical system as the quantum number n gets large. For n = 1 you found that quantum mechanics predicts that the probability of finding the particle between x = 0 and x = 0.2 is 0.196 whereas for n = 100 the probability is 0.332. What would be the probability for a classical system?
 
TSny said:
For a problem like this, the correspondence principle implies that the quantum system should behave like a classical system as the quantum number n gets large. For n = 1 you found that quantum mechanics predicts that the probability of finding the particle between x = 0 and x = 0.2 is 0.196 whereas for n = 100 the probability is 0.332. What would be the probability for a classical system?

So for the classical system if we divide the well into 6 equal parts then the probability of finding the particle in anyone of those parts 1/6=0.166. But as the quantum number gets larger, why does the probabillity not converge to this number?

0.332 is a lot larger than 0.166. I divided the well into 6 parts because we are considering the probability in 0.1 from the left-hand wall and the well is 0.6 nm in width.
 
roam said:
So for the classical system if we divide the well into 6 equal parts,

Rethink that 6 :wink: The distance from x = 0 to x = .2 is what fraction of the total width of the well? Remember, you are calculating the probability of the particle being anywhere in that interval.
 
TSny said:
Rethink that 6 :wink: The distance from x = 0 to x = .2 is what fraction of the total width of the well? Remember, you are calculating the probability of the particle being anywhere in that interval.

Thank you very much for your help. I understand it now. Thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K