Quantum Mechanics Proof Homework Help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the function u(z,t)=f(z-vt) satisfies the wave equation ∂²u/∂t² = v² · ∂²u/∂z². Participants emphasize that the proof is purely mathematical and unrelated to Lorentz transformations. Key steps include taking the partial time-derivative of f(z-vt), which is crucial for demonstrating the solution. The conversation highlights the importance of showing attempts at solutions to receive effective help.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations in physics
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with the function notation f(z-vt)
  • Basic calculus concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the wave equation in classical mechanics
  • Learn about partial derivatives and their applications in physics
  • Review function transformations and their implications in wave mechanics
  • Explore mathematical proofs related to differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics, mathematicians interested in differential equations, and educators seeking to enhance their teaching methods in calculus and physics.

SlushmanIU
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was asked to prove that any function u(z,t)=f(z-vt) is a solution of the wave equation
∂2u/ dt2= v2 · ∂2u/dz2

I know that v is constant and z and t are independent. I've tried looking at Lorentz law but I am getting nowhere fast. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Slushman, and welcome to the wonderful world of PF :)

We don't have many rules (just a bunch of well-meant guidelines, which please read). They do require (so you could construe that as a rule) some effort on your part in the sense that you show your attempt at solution. They also want you (so you could construe that as a rule as well -- but it's all well meant!) to use the template, which happened to disappear as if by magic from your post. Pity, I could have helped immediately, instead of tomorrow morning (it's late here, but perhaps others ...)

1. Homework Statement

2. Homework Equations

3. The Attempt at a Solution

When I fill in the propposed solution, I get ...​
 
Hi. This is pure mathematics so Lorentz has nothing to do with your proof:
How do you take the partial time-derivative of f(z-vt)? That is: f[z(t) -vt]?
Look up a calculus book if that's unfamiliar..
 
Slushman still there ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K