Quantum Mechanics - Time dependent solution - x's and t's not mixed up

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formulation of a time-dependent solution in quantum mechanics, specifically questioning the notation of the wavefunction as wavefunction(x,t) instead of wavefunction(x). The participant notes that this notation appears consistently throughout the equations, leading to confusion about its correctness. There are mentions of potential typos in the equations, particularly regarding the function F(t) and its absence in certain terms. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical notation within quantum mechanics. Overall, the focus is on ensuring accurate representation of functions in the context of wave mechanics.
laser
Messages
104
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
description
Relevant Equations
description
Screenshot_6.png


Next, we assume a solution in this form:
Screenshot_7.png


Which simplifies (according to my notes) to this:
Screenshot_8.png


In the middle equation, we have factorised out the F(t). My question is why is it wavefunction(x,t) rather than wavefunction(x). I first thought it was a mistake in the notes, but it uses the same equation later on.

Edit: And F(t) on the rightmost equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably just a typo. It should be ##\psi(x)##. Also, ##F(t)## is missing in the last term on the right in the last equation.
 
DrClaude said:
Probably just a typo. It should be ##\psi(x)##. Also, ##F(t)## is missing in the last term on the right in the last equation.
Cheers - yeah I forgot to mention that here but you're right
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top