Quantum Mechanics - Time dependent solution - x's and t's not mixed up

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the formulation of a time-dependent solution in quantum mechanics, specifically questioning the notation of the wavefunction as wavefunction(x,t) instead of wavefunction(x). The participant notes that this notation appears consistently throughout the equations, leading to confusion about its correctness. There are mentions of potential typos in the equations, particularly regarding the function F(t) and its absence in certain terms. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical notation within quantum mechanics. Overall, the focus is on ensuring accurate representation of functions in the context of wave mechanics.
laser
Messages
104
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
description
Relevant Equations
description
Screenshot_6.png


Next, we assume a solution in this form:
Screenshot_7.png


Which simplifies (according to my notes) to this:
Screenshot_8.png


In the middle equation, we have factorised out the F(t). My question is why is it wavefunction(x,t) rather than wavefunction(x). I first thought it was a mistake in the notes, but it uses the same equation later on.

Edit: And F(t) on the rightmost equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably just a typo. It should be ##\psi(x)##. Also, ##F(t)## is missing in the last term on the right in the last equation.
 
DrClaude said:
Probably just a typo. It should be ##\psi(x)##. Also, ##F(t)## is missing in the last term on the right in the last equation.
Cheers - yeah I forgot to mention that here but you're right
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
951
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
974
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K