Quantum Mechanics Treatment of Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the quantum mechanics treatment of the harmonic oscillator, specifically analyzing the Hamiltonian defined as H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2 and the operators a and a^+. Participants demonstrate that the commutation relation [a,a^+]=1 holds true and derive the Hamiltonian in terms of the number operator N. The eigenvalues of N are confirmed to be real, and the completeness of the eigenstates |n> is established through the properties of Hermitian operators and the application of commutation relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with operator algebra and commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Hermitian operators and their properties.
  • Basic grasp of eigenvalues and eigenstates in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the harmonic oscillator's Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the properties of Hermitian operators and their implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the completeness relation for eigenstates in quantum systems.
  • Investigate the significance of commutation relations in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to ladder operators.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers focusing on quantum systems, particularly those studying harmonic oscillators and operator theory.

jameson2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the Hamiltonian for the harmonic oscillator H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2 , and [x,p]=i\hbar. Define the operators a=\frac{ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}} and a^+=\frac{-ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}}

(1) show that [a,a^+]=1 and that H= \hbar\omega(a^+a+\frac{1}{2})

(2) Let N=a^+ a so that H= \hbar\omega(N+\frac{1}{2}). Denote the eigenstates of N by |n>: N|n>=n|n>. Are the eigenvalues of N real? Why? Are the states {|n>} complete? Why?

Use [a,a^+]=1 to show that a^+ |n> = c_+|n+1> and a |n> = c_-|n-1> where the c values are constants. (Hint: consider Na^+ |n>=(a^+N+[N,a^+])|n> and Na|n>=(aN+[N,a])|n>. Show that [N,a^+]=a^+ , [N,a]=-a.)


Homework Equations


Above


The Attempt at a Solution


(a) I got his part easy enough.

(b)I know the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real, but I don't know how to show that the product of a and it's adjoint is Hermitian (or if it's not not?). I don't know how to approach the completeness part of the question.

I've worked out the parts in the hint that ask you to show the two commutator identities and I understand why the other equations in the hint are true, but I've no idea how to apply the hint to solving the actual question. What's mainly throwing me is how to get |n> and |n+1> in the same equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jameson2 said:

Homework Statement


Given the Hamiltonian for the harmonic oscillator H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2 , and [x,p]=i\hbar. Define the operators a=\frac{ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}} and a^+=\frac{-ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}}

(1) show that [a,a^+]=1 and that H= \hbar\omega(a^+a+\frac{1}{2})

(2) Let N=a^+ a so that H= \hbar\omega(N+\frac{1}{2}). Denote the eigenstates of N by |n>: N|n>=n|n>. Are the eigenvalues of N real? Why? Are the states {|n>} complete? Why?

Use [a,a^+]=1 to show that a^+ |n> = c_+|n+1> and a |n> = c_-|n-1> where the c values are constants. (Hint: consider Na^+ |n>=(a^+N+[N,a^+])|n> and Na|n>=(aN+[N,a])|n>. Show that [N,a^+]=a^+ , [N,a]=-a.)

Homework Equations


Above

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) I got his part easy enough.

(b)I know the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real, but I don't know how to show that the product of a and it's adjoint is Hermitian (or if it's not not?). I don't know how to approach the completeness part of the question.
Usually, one of the first things you learn about adjoints is how to find the adjoint of a product. Are you sure you haven't already covered this before and just forgotten?
I've worked out the parts in the hint that ask you to show the two commutator identities and I understand why the other equations in the hint are true, but I've no idea how to apply the hint to solving the actual question. What's mainly throwing me is how to get |n> and |n+1> in the same equation.
What you want to show is that N(a†|n⟩) = (n+1)(a†|n⟩). What does this tell you about the state a†|n⟩?
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K