Quantum mechanics, zero point energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the zero point energy of an electron confined within a region of \(10^{-14}\) m, which is comparable to the size of a nucleus. Participants are comparing this energy to the potential energy between a proton and an electron, as well as the gravitational potential energy at the same distance. There is also a focus on the implications of these energies regarding the possibility of finding an electron within a nucleus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the time-independent Schrödinger's equation and the assumptions regarding potential energy within the confinement. There are questions about boundary conditions for the wavefunction and the implications of periodic solutions. Some participants express confusion about the normalization of the wavefunction and the quantization of energy levels.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the mathematical setup and boundary conditions, with some participants suggesting corrections to previous equations. Multiple interpretations of the problem's dimensionality (1D vs 3D) are being considered, and there is acknowledgment of potential errors in calculations. Guidance has been offered regarding the implications of boundary conditions on the wavefunction.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for solving the problem. There is a noted uncertainty regarding the appropriate dimensionality of the problem and the implications of the calculated energies.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


Estimate the zero point energy of an electron confined into a region of [tex]10^{-14}m[/tex] which is around the magnitude of the nucleus. Compare this energy with the potential energy between a proton and an electron and the gravitational potential energy with the same distance [tex]10^{-14}m[/tex]. Discuss on the possibility that an electron can be found inside a nucleus.

Homework Equations


[tex]E_p_1=-\frac{ke^2}{r}[/tex]
[tex]E_p_2=-\frac{Gm_em_p}{r}[/tex].
[tex]\int _{0}^{10^{-14}} |\Psi (x)|^2dx=1[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution



I guess I must find that the zero point energy of the electron is greater than both the potential energy gravitational and Coulombian and so there's a possibility to find it inside a nucleus.

What I've done is to write the time independent Schrödinger's equation with a potential function V(x)=0. Because I assumed that there were walls of potential surrounding the electron and inside the region its potential would be 0.
The solution to Schrödinger's equation gave me [tex]\Psi (x)=c_1 e^{-\frac{2m_eEx}{\hbar}} + c_2[/tex]. Just to be sure, the equation I "solved" is [tex]-\frac{\hbar}{2m_e} \frac{d^2 \Psi}{dx^2}=E\Psi[/tex].
But I'm not given any initial conditions, maybe only contour conditions...
I need some help in order to find [tex]c_1[/tex] and [tex]c_2[/tex].

Then I guess I must see if [tex]|\Psi |^2[/tex] is normalized by evaluating [tex]\int _{0}^{10^{-14}} |\Psi (x)| ^2dx[/tex] and it must equal to 1?
If it's not, I just multiply [tex]\Psi[/tex] by a constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the electron is confined to the box, what must be the value of the wavefunction evaluated on the sides of the box?

Also, this is technically a 3D problem, you should make some assumptions about the geometry and set up the proper integrals to compute normalizations and expectation values. You're also missing something in your solution since it's not periodic.
 
Thanks a lot for your help.
fzero said:
If the electron is confined to the box, what must be the value of the wavefunction evaluated on the sides of the box?
Like at any other point: zero I believe.

Also, this is technically a 3D problem, you should make some assumptions about the geometry and set up the proper integrals to compute normalizations and expectation values.
I agree the problem should be a 3D one, but since they give the value [tex]10^{-14}m[/tex], I think they meant a 1D problem.
You're also missing something in your solution since it's not periodic.
Oh damn it...
Is the equation to solve equivalent to [tex]\Psi ''-\frac{E}{K} \Psi =0[/tex] with [tex]K=-\frac{\hbar}{2m_e}[/tex]? If so I'll recheck what I've done.
 
fluidistic said:
Thanks a lot for your help.
Like at any other point: zero I believe.

OK, so that's your boundary condition.

I agree the problem should be a 3D o
ne, but since they give the value [tex]10^{-14}m[/tex], I think they meant a 1D problem.

It's possible, especially if you haven't covered the hydrogen atom yet.

Oh damn it...
Is the equation to solve equivalent to [tex]\Psi ''-\frac{E}{K} \Psi =0[/tex] with [tex]K=-\frac{\hbar}{2m_e}[/tex]? If so I'll recheck what I've done.

Writing it that way will only get you in trouble. The equation is

[tex]\Psi ''= -\omega^2 \Psi[/tex] with [tex]\omega= \sqrt{\frac{2m_eE}{\hbar}},[/tex]

which has periodic solutions.
 
Last edited:
fzero said:
OK, so that's your boundary condition.



It's possible, especially if you haven't covered the hydrogen atom yet.



Writing it that way will only get you in trouble. The equation is

[tex]\Psi ''= -\omega^2 \Psi =0[/tex] with [tex]\omega= \sqrt{\frac{2m_eE}{\hbar}},[/tex]

which has periodic solutions.
Thanks once again.
How did you know that [tex]\Psi '' =0[/tex] and further, that it's also worth [tex]-\omega ^2 \Psi[/tex]?

Ok I'll work on the solutions.
 
fluidistic said:
Thanks once again.
How did you know that [tex]\Psi '' =0[/tex] and further, that it's also worth [tex]-\omega ^2 \Psi[/tex]?

Sorry that was a typo that I've now fixed. I was editing one of your equations and forgot to delete the =0 part.
 
fzero said:
Sorry that was a typo that I've now fixed. I was editing one of your equations and forgot to delete the =0 part.
Ok I see.
I reached [tex]\Psi (x)=c_1 sin (\omega x) + c_2 \cos (\omega x)[/tex].
With the boundary condition [tex]\Psi (0)=0[/tex], I get that [tex]c_2=0[/tex].

My problem is with the other boundary condition, namely [tex]\Psi (10^{-14})=0[/tex].
It gives [tex]c_1 \sin (\omega \cdot 10^{-14})=0 \Rightarrow c_1=0[/tex] and thus [tex]\Psi (x)=0 \forall x[/tex].
 
fluidistic said:
Ok I see.
I reached [tex]\Psi (x)=c_1 sin (\omega x) + c_2 \cos (\omega x)[/tex].
With the boundary condition [tex]\Psi (0)=0[/tex], I get that [tex]c_2=0[/tex].

My problem is with the other boundary condition, namely [tex]\Psi (10^{-14})=0[/tex].
It gives [tex]c_1 \sin (\omega \cdot 10^{-14})=0 \Rightarrow c_1=0[/tex] and thus [tex]\Psi (x)=0 \forall x[/tex].

You're forgetting that [tex]\sin(\omega L)[/tex] can vanish for certain values of [tex]\omega L[/tex]. Instead of concluding [tex]c_1=0[/tex], we conclude that [tex]\omega[/tex] and hence the energy [tex]E[/tex] is quantized.
 
fzero said:
You're forgetting that [tex]\sin(\omega L)[/tex] can vanish for certain values of [tex]\omega L[/tex]. Instead of concluding [tex]c_1=0[/tex], we conclude that [tex]\omega[/tex] and hence the energy [tex]E[/tex] is quantized.

You're absolutely right.
I get [tex]10^{-14}\omega =n \pi[/tex] with [tex]n\in \mathbb{Z}[/tex]. Taking n=1 for ground state, I get [tex]E_0=\frac{10^{24}\pi ^2 \hbar}{2 m_e}\approx 7.7 \times 10 ^{24}J[/tex] which is obviously way too large. I'll recheck my arithmetics.
 
  • #10
Hmm can someone help me fixing my error? I've redone the arithmetics and still find this ridiculous answer.
Edit: I think I made a mistake writing down Schrödinger's equation. There should be a hbar squared term instead of just hbar...

Edit 2: I found out that the zero point energy is around [tex]2.37 \times 10 ^{-8}J[/tex] (still enormous to me, what do you say?), while the Coulombian potential energy is of the order of [tex]10^{-14}J[/tex] and the gravitational potential energy if of the order of [tex]10^{-53}J[/tex]. Now how does this imply that an electron can be found inside a nucleus, I have no idea.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K